Author: Expert Witness Profiler
-
Vocational Rehabilitation Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Economic Horizons
Natasha Shea was involved in a slip and fall accident at Kalahari Resort in thePennsylvania Pocono Mountains on March 11, 2023. Defendants sought to preclude Plaintiff Natasha Walkowicz Shea from offering any testimony from her economic loss experts John W. Dieckman, MS, CRC, CDMC and Andrew C. Verzilli, MBA. Vocational Rehabilitation Expert Witness John W. Dieckman, MS,…
-
Internal Medicine Expert’s Testimony on a Syncopal Episode Admitted
On June 3, 2020, Matthew Vomero was driving a tractor trailer when his vehicle crashed into a building insured by Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company (“Travelers”). At the time of the accident, Vomero was acting in the course and scope of his employment with U.S. Xpress. The parties dispute whether Defendants have presented admissible…
-
Event Management Expert’s Use-of-Force Opinions Excluded
This dispute stems from a February 08, 2017 incident in which MSG security guards and New York City Police Department officers forcibly removed Charles Oakley from a New York Knicks basketball game at Madison Square Garden. Defendants MSG Networks, Inc., Madison Square Garden Sports Corp., and Sphere Entertainment Group, LLC (collectively, “MSG”) filed a motion…
-
Privacy Expert’s Testimony on Alexa Users Limited
This class action lawsuit arises out of Amazon’s practice of using smart-speaker technology (“Alexa”) to surreptitiously: (a) intercept; (b) eavesdrop; (c) record; (d) disclose; or (e) use millions of Americans’ voices and communications, all without their knowledge or consent. Such conduct blatantly violates Washington’s wiretapping law, which applies nationwide to Plaintiffs and all members of…
-
Mechanical Engineering Expert Allowed to Opine on Clear Warnings
This lawsuit arises out of the death of Timothy L. Stringer (“Stringer”) resulting from a May 15, 2021, explosion on an offshore oil and gas production platform owned by Fieldwood Energy LLC (“Fieldwood”). At the time of the accident, Stringer was working on the platform and, along with another employee, was performing a pressure integrity…
-
Human Resources Expert Was Not Allowed to Opine on an Employer’s Obligations
Plaintiff Andrew Brown alleged that CSX Transportation, Inc. violated his rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) by subjecting him to CSX’s attendance policy and by suspending and ultimately terminating him for taking FMLA leave. Brown hired Beth De Lima, a “Human Resource / Vocational Rehabilitation consultant,” to offer an expert opinion on…
-
Industrial Hygiene Expert’s Testimony on Asbestos Exposures Admitted
In this litigation, Plaintiffs Erica Dandry Constanza and Monica Dandry Hallner (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) alleged that Decedent Michael P. Dandry, Jr. (“Decedent”), while an employee for Defendant Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (“Avondale”), was exposed to asbestos and asbestos-containing products manufactured, distributed, sold, and/or handled by Avondale and other parties. Avondale filed a Daubert motion to exclude the testimony…
-
Beauty Industry Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Skinnification
Plaintiff Vicious Brands, Inc., doing business as Saints & Sinners, brought this action against Defendants Face Co., LLC, Skin Saint, LLC, and Holly Cutler, alleging that Defendants infringed Plaintiff’s trademark and falsely advertised Defendants’ skincare products. Plaintiff relied in part on an expert declaration of Karen Young, a beauty industry consultant. Defendants challenged the declaration…
-
Economics Expert’s Testimony on Lost Productivity Excluded
This case involves alleged damage to a plasma cutter that was to be used for a welding business. Plaintiff Giger Welding and Fabrication, LLC (“Giger”), purchased a plasma cutter from an auction in Texas to assist with its welding business in Missouri. To get the plasma cutter to Missouri, Giger contracted with Defendants DFW Movers…
-
Radiation Oncology Expert’s “State of the Art” Opinions Admitted
In this litigation, Plaintiffs Erica Dandry Constanza and Monica Dandry Hallner (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) alleged that Decedent Michael P. Dandry, Jr. (“Decedent”), while an employee for Defendant Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (“Avondale”), was exposed to asbestos and asbestos-containing products manufactured, distributed, sold, and/or handled by Avondale and other parties. Avondale filed a Daubert motion to exclude certain…
