Author: Expert Witness Profiler
-
Law Enforcement Expert Not Allowed to Opine on Tattoo Appearance Policy Standards
Benjamin Torres is a Captain with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. He claimed that he was retaliated against by the Department for having a station tattoo. Specifically, he alleged that he had been passed over for promotion because of a Department “policy” that prevents individuals with station tattoos from being promoted to Commander. Defendants…
-
Statistics Expert Allowed to Opine on PFAS Exposure
This case arises out of the contamination of surface waters and drinking water in Chattooga County, Georgia, with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances known as “PFAS.” In essence, Plaintiff Earl Parris, Jr., alleged that the Defendants have contaminated his city’s water supply and thus his household water with PFAS. Parris is a resident of Summerville, Georgia,…
-
Traffic Safety Expert’s Due Diligence Opinions Admitted
In this civil action, the Plaintiffs—Jacob Yoder, Shawn Yoder, and Natasha Yoder—brought various state-law claims against Conaway Racing & Trucking, LLC (“Conaway”); Aaron J. Pacheco; Builders FirstSource, Inc., Builders FirstSource-Atlantic Group, and Probuild Company, LLC (collectively, the “BFS Defendants”); and D.R. Horton, Inc., along with an unnamed John Doe Defendant, arising from a motor-vehicle accident…
-
Geology Expert’s Testimony on Potential Alternative Sources Admitted
This case arises out of the contamination of surface waters and drinking water in Chattooga County, Georgia, with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances known as “PFAS.” In essence, Plaintiff Earl Parris, Jr., alleged that the Defendants have contaminated his city’s water supply and thus his household water with PFAS. Parris is a resident of Summerville, Georgia,…
-
Survey Research Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Customer Experience
State of Connecticut and Federal Trade Commission, sued Chase Nissan LLC, d/b/a Manchester City Nissan (“MCN) and multiple individuals, alleging that MCN, along with others, acted together to defraud thousands of consumers. The Plaintiffs alleged that the Defendants charged consumers for additional products or services (“addons”) that consumers never agreed to purchase. The Plaintiffs claimed…
-
Computer Science Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Minting Activity
Plaintiff Trenton Smith brought claims against Defendant Nelk, Inc. doing business as Nelk or Full Send, Defendant Nelk USA, Inc., Defendant Metacard LLC, Defendant Kyle Forgeard (“Kyle”), and Defendant John Shahidi (“John”) (collectively, “Defendants”) related to Plaintiff’s Metacard purchases. Smith alleged that Defendants made promises regarding the benefits of owning a the Metacard NFT (“Metacard”)…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Ride-Along Policies
Zailey Hess sued former Hammond police officer Jamie Garcia, alleging that he sexually assaulted and harassed her during a ride-along for her criminal justice class in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses. Garcia filed a motion to exclude the testimony of Hess’ expert witness, Dan Kender. Law Enforcement Expert Witness…
-
Psychology Expert’s CPTSD Opinions Admitted
Danesh Noshirvan, an online entertainer and journalist, filed a civil action against Jennifer Couture alleging conspiracy and agency liability, as well as claims for defamation, tortious interference, misappropriation of likeness, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Noshirvan alleged that Couture, Dr. Ralph Garramone, M.D. and OMG Realty, LLC , along with the other named Co-Defendants,…
-
Intellectual Property Expert’s Opinion on Misappropriation Excluded
In 2018, Rock Fuel Media pitched its concept for a sports-gaming platform called “VSports Live” to Resorts World Las Vegas LLC during the development stage of Resorts World’s casino and resort on the Las Vegas Strip. Resorts World did not end up contracting with Rock Fuel, and Rock Fuel never built the VSports Live platform.…
-
Automotive Industry Expert’s Testimony on Pricing Practices Excluded
The Plaintiffs in this putative national class action are insureds who filed “total loss” claims for the actual cash value (“ACV”) of their totaled vehicles under their automobile insurance policies sold by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company or State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (collectively, “Defendants” or “State Farm”). Plaintiffs challenged State Farm’s application…
