Author: Expert Witness Profiler
-
Law Enforcement Expert Witness’ Opinion About Officer’s Demeanor Has Marginal Relevance
Joshua Briggs was arrested for Disorderly Conduct and Harassment because he called Anchorage Police Officer Orean Yi a pig. Briggs filed this lawsuit alleging that he was arrested without probable cause in retaliation for exercising his First Amendment rights. Officer Yi asserted that he had probable cause to arrest Briggs because Briggs was making sufficient…
-
Human Factors Expert Witness’ Opinion About the Alleged Design Deficiencies of the Boppy Newborn Lounger Admitted
The Boppy Newborn Lounger (“BNL”) was on the market for nearly sixteen years, and during that time, Boppy sold over 3.3 million BNLs. Boppy’s warnings and marketing made clear that the BNL was intended to give caregivers a place to lay infants down for supervised awake time only, but never for sleeping. As with any…
-
Real Estate Valuation Expert Witness’ Testimony on Appreciation Impairment Damages Admitted
108 named Plaintiffs admitted that they purchased their Shipyard properties for residential purposes. Plaintiffs each bought units on Parcel A of the former Hunters Point Naval Shipyard (“HPNS”). HPNS is a Superfund site where Tetra Tech EC, Inc. (“TtEC”) conducted environmental remediation work in certain areas years before the Plaintiffs bought their units. Plaintiffs now…
-
Marketing Expert Witness’ Testimony on Consumer Perceptions Excluded Because His Survey is Flawed
Plaintiff Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC (“MET”) accused Under Armour of false advertising in relation to certain products that contain bioceramic powder. MET contended that Under Armour inaccurately claimed that the Federal Food and Drug Administration had determined that those products enhanced recovery. Under Armour sells activewear and sleepwear products directly to consumers. This includes the…
-
Marketing Expert Witness’ Testimony on Consumer Confusion Deemed Speculative
Plaintiff IEP Technologies, LLC brought this action against Defendants KPM Analytics, Incorporated f/k/a Statera Analytics, Incorporated and KPM Analytics North America Corporation f/k/a Process Sensors Corporation (collectively “KPM”) for allegedly violating IEP’s trademark. The complaint asserts violations of the Lanham Act, besides a claim for common law trademark infringement and unfair competition. Genuine disputes of material…
-
Environmental Science Expert Witness’ Analysis of Historical Emissions Deemed Reliable
Over sixty Plaintiffs alleged that Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation’s weapons manufacturing facility in Orlando released toxic chemicals that contaminated the air, soil, and groundwater, leading to various injuries among the Plaintiffs. The instant case formed a part of a group of related toxic tort cases. Following a complex history during the dispositive motion stage, the…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Testimony on Damages Admitted Because it Includes Independent Analysis
Plaintiff American Power, LLC (“AMP”) is a trucking-logistics company headquartered in Dayton, Ohio. According to the Complaint, Plaintiff invested in and loaned $450,000 to Defendant Dektrix LLC, a transportation-servicing company headquartered in Utah. The Complaint charges that the investment and loan were fraudulently obtained and ultimately worthless. Plaintiff sought to impose liability upon Dektrix and…
-
Social Work Expert Witness’ Testimony Regarding Fresno County’s Investigation of Abuse and Neglect Allegations Excluded
Plaintiff Ethan Levi (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on behalf of J.C., a minor child, against the Oregon Department of Human Services (“DHS”) and several of its employees (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff’s complaint alleges civil rights violations arising out of the sexual abuse of J.C. while in the custody of DHS-certified foster care provider Joe Albert Raygosa.…
-
Ophthalmology Expert Witness’ Testimony Not Fully Excluded Because He Understands Color Vision Acuity Testing
Plaintiff Mark Walker (“Walker”) worked as a locomotive engineer for Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”) from approximately 2005 through 2019. After the Court dismissed Walker’s claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) alleging failure to accommodate, Walker’s remaining claims allege disparate treatment and disparate impact in violation of the ADA. Walker contends…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Testimony Excluded Because He Makes No Effort to Distinguish Lost Profit Damages
It all started when GE and X-Ray contracted for the acquisition, sale and purchase of certain equipment and services required to outfit a nuclear radiopharmaceutical laboratory—the first of its kind in Jamaica. X-Ray later accused GE Entities of breaching their duties of care to X-Ray and breaching various components of the operative agreement– the International…
