Author: Expert Witness Profiler
-
Testimony of Orthopedic Surgery Expert Witness Excluded due to Lack Of Evidence About His Methods
A district judge in New Mexico struck the testimony of Defendant’s orthopedic surgery expert witness Paul Saiz due to lack of a record discussing the reasoning or methodology underlying his testimony. Plaintiff’s injuries and damages in this case resulted from an automobile accident on July 11, 2021, in Grant County, New Mexico. At that time,…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Witness’ Testimony on the Police Officers’ Conduct Admitted
A district judge in Louisiana admitted a law enforcement expert’s testimony summarizing police procedures. Cortez alleged that on November 21, 2019, his wife had called 911 and requested that police be dispatched so she could leave their residence without incident because Cortez was in an agitated mood. Cortez averred that an altercation had ensued after…
-
Testimony by Accident Reconstruction Expert Witness Regarding Missouri Statute Violation Limited
A district judge in Missouri partly excluded the testimony of an expert accident reconstructionist retained to opine on the safety of the crossing. The case began with a train-vehicle collision near Mineral Point, Missouri, on August 19, 2019. Anthony Courtois drove a 2007 Freightliner dump truck westward toward North Oak Road’s railroad crossing. As he…
-
Insurance Expert Witness’ Report on Bad Faith Deemed Inadmissible
A district judge in Texas refused to admit the insurance expert witness’ bad faith report because it failed to explain how exactly the Defendant violated the generally accepted adjusting standards. On February 17, 2021, a Texas winter storm damaged a commercial building owned by Barron. Century insured that building under a surplus lines renewal policy.…
-
Financial Expert Witness’ Opinion on the Reasonableness of the Recordkeeping Fees Rejected
A district judge in Kentucky found the analysis presented by the financial expert witness limited. This class action arises under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). On behalf of the Humana Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”) and its participants, Plaintiffs brought claims for (1) “Breach of Fiduciary Duty of Prudence” and (2) “Failure…
-
Court refuses to exclude Pharmaceutical Expert Witness’ Opinions Regarding Breadth of Asserted Claims
A district judge in Florida refused to exclude the testimony of a pharmaceutical expert witness despite allegations of fundamental flaws in the assumptions on which her calculations are based. Defendant Aveva Drug Delivery Systems, Inc. of an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) No. 217221 to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) sought approval to…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Analysis of Costs and Markups Admitted
The Trade Group’s (“TTG”) is a full-service event marketing and creative design firm well known for its award-winning designs and client-centered service mentality. BTC Media, LLC (“BTCM”), a Bitcoin and blockchain media company approached TTG about managing, planning, and producing Bitcoin 2021, the world’s largest bitcoin conference held in Miami, Florida. After a successful Bitcoin…
-
Elections Expert Witness Barred from Providing Opinions on the Interpretation of Campaign Finance Laws
In March 2023, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, indicted Donald Trump on 34 charges tied to the hush money payments, accusing him of “falsifying New York business records to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.” It all started when the Wall Street Journal reported…
-
Safety Expert Witness’ Testimony on Situational Awareness and Duty of Care Rejected
A district judge in Oklahoma noted the expert witness’ extensive background in event safety at live events but barred him from testifying because he never inspected the area where Plaintiff fell and ignored relevant statutes and codes. Plaintiff Boulac sought damages for injuries she allegedly sustained at the Bank of Oklahoma Center (“BOK Center”) in…
-
Montana Court rules against “fossil fuel–based provisions” in favor of a “clean and healthful environment”
On March 13, 2020, sixteen Montana youth (collectively Plaintiffs or Youth Plaintiffs), then between two and 18 years old, filed a complaint against the State of Montana challenging the constitutionality of the State’s fossil fuel-based state energy system, which they alleged caused and contributed to climate change in violation of their constitutional rights guaranteed under Article II,…
