Category: Economics Expert Witness
-
Economics Expert Witness’ Opinion on the Necessity, or Lack Thereof, of Expert Economic Analysis Excluded
The tenant-Plaintiffs in this case alleged that the Defendants, a national real estate investment and property management conglomerate, use illegal leases and engage in practices that violate the Plaintiffs’ rights under Washington’s Residential Landlord Tenant Act (“RLTA”). The Plaintiffs also contend that the Defendants breached their duty of good faith and fair dealing. They sought damages,…
-
Standard Out-Of-Pocket Damages Methodology Employed by Economics Expert Witness Deemed Reliable
In 2007, SCANA received legislative approval to construct two nuclear reactors at the V.C. Summer Nuclear Generating Station in Fairfield County, South Carolina” (the “Nuclear Project”). Deloitte served as SCANA’s external auditor for over 70 years. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98 Pension Fund alleges that, “[t]hroughout the Class Period, Deloitte repeatedly violated its…
-
Economics Expert Witness’ Testimony Admitted Due to Her Significant Experience in Market and Risk Analysis
Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) charged that Defendant Matthew Panuwat engaged in insider trading in violation of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), by using his insider knowledge about Medivation, Inc.’s plan to announce an upcoming merger to make leveraged, short-term trades in Incyte Corporation (“Incyte”) call…
-
Economics Expert Witness’ Conjoint Analysis and Damages Model Deemed Admissible
Plaintiff David Swartz brought this case against Defendants Dave’s Killer Bread, Inc. and Flowers Foods, Inc. under the California Unfair Competition Law, alleging that Defendants violated Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) regulations, and therefore California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), by including unlawful labels on their bread products. Plaintiff moved to certify a class on a…
-
Economics Expert Witness’ Improper State-of-Mind Testimony Excluded
Plaintiffs Richard Dennis, Port 22, LLC, and Michael Glass asserted Commodity Exchange Act and Sherman Antitrust Act claims, alleging that the Andersons, Inc. and Cargill Incorporated, who were supposed competitors, operated multiple grain storage warehouses in Ohio and collaborated to manipulate prices of soft red winter wheat futures and options contracts on the Chicago Board of…
-
Economics Expert Witness’ Testimony Limited Because His Zero Damages Opinion is Irrelevant
Plaintiff I-Mab Biopharma (“I-Mab” or “Plaintiff”) brought trade secret misappropriation claims against Defendants Inhibrx, Inc. (“Inhibrx”) and Brendan Eckelman (“Dr. Eckelman” and collectively with Inhibrx, “Defendants”). Plaintiff asserted that Defendants misappropriated nine trade secrets (that correspond to molecules designed to treat cancer) that are referred to herein as Trade Secret 1, Trade Secret 2, Trade…
-
Court Approves of Economics Expert Witness’ Ex Ante Approach to Damages Calculation
Plaintiffs are a group of current and former KCS employees working as conductors and engineers, collectively referred to as Train, Engine & Yard (“TE&Y”) employees by the parties. They alleged an FMLA (Family and Medical Leave Act) discrimination claim based on KCS’s practice of placing on-call employees at the bottom of job boards (i.e., at…
-
Economics Expert Witness’ Testimony About Hedonic Damages Limited
Plaintiff, Raul Rodriguez brought this suit to recover for personal injuries sustained by Plaintiff as a result of an accident which occurred on February 22, 2021 in Jal County, New Mexico on a well owned and operated by Defendant, Kaiser-Francis Oil Company. Rodriguez was an independent contractor attempting to open a ball valve on a…
-
Occupational Therapy Expert Witness Allowed to Opine on the Suitability and Necessity of the Health Center Policy for Firefighters
Jeremy Knorr (“Plaintiff”) worked as a firefighter for the Daisy Mountain Fire District (“the District”) from 1992 until 2019, when he was terminated at least in part due to his inability to comply with a new fitness policy (“the Health Center Policy”), adopted by the Daisy Mountain Fire District Board (“the Fire Board”) in late…
-
Economics Expert Witness’ Opinions of the Purported Economic Loss of Each Plaintiff Admitted
This case arises out of Plaintiffs’ employment with McKesson and their allegation that McKesson discriminated and retaliated against them by denying them religious accommodations to McKesson’s COVID-19 Vaccination Protocol and terminating their employment. Plaintiffs sought damages which, including lost wages, in the form of back pay and front pay, and fringe benefits. Plaintiffs retained Larry…
