Category: Marketing Expert Witness
-
Court Will Not Preclude Marketing Expert Witness From Testifying at Trial on the Basis of Untimely Disclosure
On May 20, 2020, Plaintiffs filed the complaint initiating this action against Defendants for allegedly conspiring to acquire Plaintiffs’ personal and private records from the California Department of Motor Vehicles for the purpose of sending them letters to solicit business in the form of legal representation for litigation against sellers of vehicles they had purchased. …
-
Marketing Expert Witness’ Testimony on Students’ Exposure to Fraudulent Rankings Admitted
Plaintiffs Iola Favell, Sue Zarnowski, Mariah Cummings, and Ahmad Murtada (“Plaintiffs”) alleged that Defendant University of Southern California (“USC”) engaged in a scheme to artificially inflate the U.S. News & World Report (“US News”) ranking of USC’s Rossier School of Education (“USC Rossier”) by submitting incomplete data to US News — and then marketed that…
-
Court Finds No Statement in the Marketing Expert Witness’ Survey to be Misleading
The underlying case concerns the alleged release of toxic chemicals from a manufacturing facility in Canoga Park between 1968 and 1970 by Litton Systems, Inc., an entity now owned by Defendants Northrop Grumman Corporation and Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (“Northrop Grumman”). Plaintiffs moved for class certification on their claims for negligence, private nuisance, and trespass…
-
Marketing Expert Witness’ Testimony About the Digital Marketing Strategy Employed and Its Potential Returns Excluded
Plaintiff La Canada Ventures, Inc., is a health and beauty retailer offering cosmetic products. Defendant MDalgorithms is a company that offers computer software and app technology for education and advice about the treatment of acne. Both parties create and market skin and haircare products with the root mark “MD.” Plaintiff brought this action against Defendant,…
-
Marketing Expert Witness’ Testimony on Statutory Damages Rejected
Plaintiff Amy Lee Sullivan is suing Defendant Flora, Inc. for copyright infringement of 33 illustrations that she created for Flora as part of two advertising campaigns. Sullivan offered the testimony of a financial evaluation expert, Dennis Kleinheinz. Sullivan wanted to present Kleinheinz’s calculations on Flora’s profits but the Court reserved the ruling on Sullivan’s motion…
-
Court Limited Marketing Expert Witness’ Testimony Based on Surveys Focusing on Products and Intellectual Properties
Plaintiff, Hawaii Foodservice Alliance alleged that Defendant Meadow Gold Dairies Hawaii, LLC (“MGDH”) used phrasing and imagery suggesting that the Meadow Gold brand products are sourced in Hawai`i, and these activities are misleading and deceptive because the Meadow Gold products contain milk and other products that are imported from the continental United States. Defendants Hollandia…
-
Marketing Expert Testimony admitted, case stayed for clarification
Plaintiffs are 31 professional models, actresses, and social media influencers who each earn a living promoting and licensing their image, likeness, and/or identity (collectively, “Image”) to select clients, commercial brands, and media and entertainment outlets, which rely on Plaintiffs to promote, endorse, and sponsor agreed-to goods and services. Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Orange Lantern,…
-
Marketing Expert Witness’ Survey Estimating the Likelihood of Consumer Confusion Held to be Reliable
Maker’s Mark entered into a Licensing Agreement with Spalding Group gransting an exclusive license to use its trademarks to create and sell cigars seasoned with its bourbon (the “Licensed Cigars”). After renewing the agreement a few times, in 2013, Maker’s Mark notified Spalding that it was terminating the license effective December 31, 2015. Spalding Group…
-
Survey Methodology Employed by Marketing Expert Witness Deemed Admissible
Plaintiff, Anthony Bush on behalf of a class of California consumers, brought a class action against the Defendant, Rust-Oleum Corporation for mislabeling of its “Krud Kutter” cleaning products as “non-toxic” and “Earth friendly,” contending that it violated California consumer-protection laws since the products were, in fact, harmful to humans, animals, and the environment. The operative…
-
Experts could rely on reliable “other sources” and even hearsay to offer their opinions; Court notes before admitting part of Marketing Expert Witness’ testimony
The lawsuit was a trademark infringement action filed by Forest River, Inc. against inTech Trailers, Inc. It sought injunctive relief, damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, and any other appropriate remedies. The legal action arose from inTech’s knowing and intentional infringement of Forest River’s DELLA TERRA trademark and its mountain design trademark, (“Forest River Mountain Design”) (Forest…
