Category: Expert Challenges
-
Maritime Expert’s Opinion on the Preferred Engine Manufacturer is Based on Hearsay Statements
This case concerns naval architecture, marine engineering, and a motor vessel called the “Pickle” or the “Pickle Rick.” Plaintiffs Intrepid Oceans Marine, LLC (“IOM”), Intracoastal Marine Fuel, LLC (“IMF”), and Intrepid Tankers, LLC (“IT”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are retailers of marine petroleum in Palm Beach County, Florida. Defendant JMS Naval Architects, LLC (“Defendant”) is a licensed…
-
Safety Engineering Expert Allowed to Opine on Codes and Industry Standards
On January 22, 2022, Sharon Marshall was dining at an Outback Steakhouse in Fort Smith, Arkansas, when she slipped, fell, and received serious injuries. She alleged that she slipped on soup that had spilled in the floor which Outback had negligently failed to clean up. Outback has filed motions to exclude or limit the testimony…
-
Psychiatry Expert’s Testimony Rejected for Injecting Subjective Characterizations
On September 3, 2020, Plaintiffs Dalila Yeend and Bounnam Phimasone (together with Elvin Minaya Rodriguez, Lisa LaPointe, and Shantadewie Rhamee, “Plaintiffs”) commenced this action against Akima Global Services, LLC a/k/a AGS (“AGS” or “Defendant”) in New York State Supreme Court, asserting state law claims pertaining to their civil immigration detention at the Buffalo Federal Detention…
-
Law Enforcement Expert’s Opinion on Actual Events and Police Tactics Admitted
Plaintiff Gene Raymond Bell, Jr. claimed that Defendant Officers Anthonie Korkis, Arthur Bridgeforth, and Thomas Langewicz, II used excessive force while arresting him during a traffic stop on June 23, 2019 in Southfield, Michigan. Plaintiff’s second motion in limine requested the Court to exclude or limit the testimony of Dr. Steven Amey, whom Defendants intended…
-
Audiology Expert’s “Chart Note” is Not a Proper Expert Report
This case stems from a rear-end, chain-reaction accident. Plaintiffs alleged that, on or about June 16, 2019, Plaintiff Miranda Allen was driving northbound on Interstate 5 in Skagit County, Washington, with Plaintiff J.M. as a passenger in her vehicle. While Plaintiff Allen’s vehicle was stopped in traffic, Defendant Martin Barratt, also driving northbound on Interstate…
-
Materials Science Expert’s Supplemental Report Excluded Despite a Compelling Explanation for the Tardiness
This is an insurance coverage dispute. Defendant Church Mutual Insurance Company (“Church Mutual”) insured Plaintiffs’ property. Hail damaged the property’s roof. The parties dispute whether the damage falls within Plaintiffs’ insurance policy, which precludes coverage for cosmetic damage. Plaintiffs sought to exclude the expert testimony of Christine Conner, Mark Kubena, and Ronald Dutton on the…
-
Economics Expert Allowed to Testify Despite Lacking Experience in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Named Plaintiffs Judy Kirkbride and Beeta Lewis are consumers in Ohio and Texas that purchased prescription drugs from The Kroger Company (“Kroger”) in the last several years. They alleged that Kroger, through a deceptive pricing scheme, overcharged them for prescription drugs by misreporting the “usual and customary” (U&C) prices for Plaintiffs’ medications, which resulted in…
-
Prison Management Expert Allowed to Opine on PREA Compliance
Plaintiff C. Jay Smith is a transgender woman who has been housed in men’s prisons for decades. The facts at issue in this case pertain to Plaintiff’s incarceration at San Quentin State Prison from 2013 to 2019, though she has been housed at the California Medical Facility in Vacaville since June 2019. Plaintiff filed a…
-
Law And Legal Expert’s Testimony on the Existence of an Attorney-Client Relationship Excluded
Plaintiff Iron Tax, Accounting & Financial Solutions, LLC (“Iron Tax”) brought this suit against Defendants Story Law Firm, PLLC and Travis W. Story (collectively, “Defendants” or “Story”) for legal malpractice. The claims here arise out of an underlying suit that resulted in a default judgment being entered against Iron Tax for failing to timely file…
-
Internal Medicine Expert’s Testimony Partly Excluded Because He Made Credibility Determinations
This is a medical malpractice case arising primarily out of the treatment provided to Plaintiff’s father, Santos González Ponce (“Mr. González”) at co-Defendant Doctors’ Center Hospital and Caribbean Medical Center (“CMC”) by Defendants Dr. Glorimar Santos Llanos, Dr. Glorimar Santos-Rodríguez, and Dr. Iolani García-Rosario (“Dr. García”) at those medical institutions. Plaintiff argued that Dr. Miguel…
