Category: Expert Challenges
-
Insurance Expert Witness’ Testimony Regarding the Storm Damage and Cost of Necessary Repairs Admitted
This case arises from a claim for wind/hail damage that allegedly occurred on or around December 5, 2021. The damage occurred to Plaintiffs’ property located at 16207 E. 47th Place, Tulsa, Oklahoma. State Farm inspected the home twice and found minor hail damage. State Farm did not observe any hail damage to the roof itself.…
-
Architectural Design Expert Witness’ Opinions on Retail Safety Excluded
On July 12, 2019, Plaintiff Karen Morgan went shopping for her son at Defendant’s Dick’s Sporting Goods (“DSG”) store in Gaithersburg, Maryland. As she walked through the store, she stopped to look at a display of women’s clothing. After she stooped down to look at the clothes on the bottom shelf, she felt a sudden…
-
Economics Expert Witness Employs a “Before and After” Methodology to Quantify Plaintiff’s Damages
This action arises out of an alleged October 22, 2016 arrest and subsequent criminal prosecution of Plaintiff, which concluded with Plaintiff’s conviction for misdemeanor battery upon Officer Ermeri. On October 20, 2020, Plaintiff Richard John Lucibella (“Lucibella”) filed a nine-count complaint in state court against Officer Richard Ermeri (“Ermeri”), Officer Savino (“Savino”), and the Town…
-
Mechanical Engineering Expert Witness’ Theories Explaining the Tire Blowout Partly Admitted
This case stems from a tire blowout that occurred while Plaintiff Kenneth Harris was at work driving his employer’s truck, which was outfitted with tires manufactured by Defendant Michelin North America. That tire blowout caused Harris’s truck to flip multiple times, resulting in injuries to his “neck, back, hip, arm, elbow, and head.” Causation is…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Testimony About Misleading Financial Records Admitted
In this alleged fraudulent transfer case, Plaintiff Shuler Drilling Company, LLC (“Shuler”) obtained a judgment in the Western District of Arkansas against Southern Management, a company wholly owned by the Disiere Defendants. After some contentious, post-judgment discovery disputes in Arkansas, Shuler brought the present action under the Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“TUFTA”) against the…
-
Criminal Law Expert Witness’ Disclosure Fails to Comply with Rule 16 Requirements with Respect to Three Bullet Points
In a white-collar criminal case where Defendants were charged with conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud in a pump-and-dump scheme through a publicly traded company, Defendants Paul Spivak and Olga Smirnova filed a motion to exclude the testimony of Peter Melley under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Melley is…
-
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Expert Witness Barred from Offering Opinions on Dental Ergonomics
Easter filed a claim with UNUM, the issuer of his long-term disability insurance policy, asserting he was disabled since December 21, 2019 and unable to continue practicing dentistry. UNUM initially determined he was totally disabled pursuant to the policy and started to pay him benefits. But his claim was later closed after UNUM determined that…
-
Petroleum Engineering Expert Witness’ Testimony About the Decline Trend in Production Admitted
Southern Oil of Louisiana, LLC filed a complaint seeking to recover damages from, among others, Alliance Offshore and the M/V MR CADE after the M/V MR CADE allided with Southern Oil’s fixed, charted offshore oil platform located in Main Pass Block 45 (the “Corvus platform”) on December 2, 2021. The allision resulted in the Corvus platform…
-
Gastroenterology Expert Witness’ Testimony Is Not Supported By An Explanation Of the Principles and Methods
Plaintiffs, Kathian Marie López-Concepción and Lenymar López-Concepción sought to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of their late father, Angel I. López-Diaz in this medical malpractice action. Plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that the medical treatment and care provided by CMC, Dr. Benny Nieves Matias, Dr. Iolani Garcia Rosario, and Dr. Cristina I. Ortiz…
-
Medical Billing Expert Witness’ Testimony About the Reasonable Charges for the Medical Procedures Excluded
This is an automobile negligence case alleging that the Plaintiffs, Fred Young and Jeff Firman were permanently injured in a rear-end collision by an employee of the Defendant, Panera, LLC. Plaintiff filed a motion to exclude or limit the testimony of Defendant’s medical billing expert, Keyona White. Plaintiffs argued White’s testimony should be excluded because her testimony…
