Tag: Diagnosis
-
Neurosurgery Expert Witness’ Causation Testimony Regarding Elbow Infection Excluded
On March 19, 2018, Ralph Monte (“Monte”) visited the Defendant Sherwin-Williams Development Corporation’s store at 4473 South Semoran Boulevard in Orlando, Florida. While attempting to negotiate the ramp from the parking lot to the sidewalk, a wheelchair-bound Monte fell and sustained injuries. He claimed that the fall occurred because Defendant negligently maintained the premises and/or…
-
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Expert Witness Precluded From Presenting Specific Testimony on the New Diagnosis
This a personal injury case in which the Plaintiff, Morgan Fitch, sought damages for injuries allegedly suffered while working as a conductor for Defendant BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). Fitch contends she was injured on February 28, 2020, while part of a train crew operating a BNSF train between…
-
Court Admits Pediatrics Expert Witness’ Specific Causation Opinion Based on Differential Diagnosis
For over 10 years, Fisher-Price sold a product called the Rock ‘n Play Sleeper (RnP). The Plaintiff, Ameena Brown, argued that the defective design of the RnP was to blame because her infant son, A.B., had died from sleeping in it. The dangers of this inclined sleeper product were widely debated in this case. It…
-
Occupational Medicine Expert Witness’ Testimony Admitted Because He Performed Independent Research on Susac Syndrome
This case concerns claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Plaintiff, Jeremy West (“West”), was hired by Defendant BNSF in January 2014 as a conductor and later as an engineer after receiving his engineer certification. In 2020, West was diagnosed with a rare medical condition, Susac Syndrome, which if…
-
Chiropractic Expert Witness is Not Qualified to Speak to the Correctness of an EMC Diagnosis
This matter involves the Plaintiff insurers’ claim that Defendants unlawfully billed for medically unnecessary and illusory services, misrepresented the nature and extent of the services, and operated in violation of various laws specific to the healthcare and/or insurance sector. According to the Plaintiff, Titan Defendants agreed to refer patients to the Stein Defendants in exchange…
