Tag: Expert Testimony
-
Nursing Expert’s Testimony Would Not Assist the Jury in Determining Whether the Plaintiff has a Disability
Bernice McLaurin has sued her former employer, the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) in Jackson, Mississippi, claiming racial discrimination and discrimination based on an unspecified medical disability. McLaurin, an African-American, was hired as a clinical pharmacist at the G.V. Sonny Montgomery Medical Center in Jackson (VAMC) on May 12, 2019, with a one-year probationary period.…
-
Court Accepts the Mortgage Expert’s Opinion on the OPERS’ Primary Fraud Theory
Defendant Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) offered Dr. Chudozie Okongwu, a mortgage market expert, to discuss the mortgage and subprime markets and the credit crisis between August 1, 2006, and November 20, 2007 (the “Relevant Period”). The lawsuit concerns whether “Freddie Mac concealed its overextension in the nontraditional mortgage market—generally composed of instruments…
-
Engineering Expert’s Testimony on the Formation of Black Ice Admitted
In a premises liability lawsuit, Plaintiff Susana Aqueche claimed she was injured after slipping on ice in the parking lot of a Hobby Lobby and is suing SVAP II Pasadena Crossroads, LLC (SVAP), Sterling Retail, Sterling Mid-Atlantic, The Sterling Organization, Paramount Crossroads, Sterling Organizational Systems, and Hobby Lobby. In response, SVAP, Sterling Retail, Sterling Mid-Atlantic,…
-
Accounting Expert Allowed to Testify Despite Lacking Forensic Accounting Expertise
This case involves a dispute over the alleged misuse of funds from two New Mexico payday lending businesses, Cashco, Inc. and Budget Payday Loans, L.P. The Light Defendants (John Ernest Light, Tina S. Light, and Investors Services, Inc.) were hired to manage the financial operations of these businesses, including record-keeping and transaction processing. They were…
-
Fire Investigation Expert’s Testimony is Crucial to Establishing the Defendants’ Alleged Negligence
Cindy Jostworth’s insurance carrier, American Strategic Insurance Corp. (ASIC), has filed a negligence claim against Craig and Elizabeth Meyer. ASIC, acting under its right of subrogation, asserted that the Meyers’ negligent burning of yard waste and debris resulted in a fire that spread and destroyed Jostworth’s residential property at 5558 Silverpoint Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio. Plaintiff’s…
-
Algorithmic Trading Expert’s Opinion is Irrelevant to Establishing Pretext under Title VII
Zongzong (Nicole) Tao has filed a lawsuit against her former employer, Simplex Investments, LLC, alleging discrimination based on gender and race/national origin, in violation of Title VII and the Illinois Human Rights Act. Simplex is a proprietary trading firm that employs algorithmic high frequency trading strategies to make profits from trading futures and equity options.…
-
Transportation Engineering Expert May Testify Only About the Standard of Care Required of a Train Operator
On January 4, 2023, 74-year-old Bonnie Thurston, accompanied by her grandchildren, Hailey and Roger Thurston, was riding a WMATA Metrorail train to Reagan National Airport. The train halted before reaching the station platform. Without any announcement of arrival or door opening, Thurston, observing the platform, stood up without holding onto any train supports. The train…
-
Family Medicine Expert Witness’ Testimony Violates the Basic Requirement of Rule 26
On July 22, 2022, Dr. Gregory Fox, individually and as parent of C.F., and Rita Fox, individually and as parent of C.F. (jointly, the Plaintiffs), filed a lawsuit challenging the state of Maine’s public school vaccination requirements. Dr. Stephen B. Paulding, a board-certified family physician with over four decades of experience in primary care was…
-
Why Expert Legal Interpretations Were Excluded in Section 504 Case
O.B., diagnosed with ADHD at age seven, sustained a severe self-inflicted gunshot wound, resulting in permanent blindness. Following the incident, his parents alleged that Colbert Elementary School in the Mead School District (MSD) failed to provide him with necessary accommodations under the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Central to the dispute was whether…
-
Economics Expert’s Revenue-Per-Minute Analysis Rejected under Daubert
The copyright infringement case between Buck Goodday Woodall (“Bucky”) and The Walt Disney Company over the film “Moana” has highlighted the critical role of expert testimony in legal disputes, particularly when dealing with complex financial analyses. Plaintiff Woodall sought to demonstrate financial damages by presenting expert testimony from Stan Smith, who proposed a “revenue-per-minute” analysis…
