Tag: Legal Conclusion
-
Experts could rely on reliable “other sources” and even hearsay to offer their opinions; Court notes before admitting part of Marketing Expert Witness’ testimony
The lawsuit was a trademark infringement action filed by Forest River, Inc. against inTech Trailers, Inc. It sought injunctive relief, damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, and any other appropriate remedies. The legal action arose from inTech’s knowing and intentional infringement of Forest River’s DELLA TERRA trademark and its mountain design trademark, (“Forest River Mountain Design”) (Forest…
-
Geotechnical Engineering Expert Witness’ testimony does not fully pass Daubert Scrutiny as Court rejects his legal conclusions on contractual responsibilities
This case is centered around a contractual dispute between Greenup Industries, LLC (“Greenup”), the general contractor, and Five S Group, LLC (“Five S”), the subcontractor, along with the involvement of Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”), related to excavation work on a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”) project. In 2020, Greenup was awarded a contract…
-
Court limits expert testimony on crash reconstruction and its contributing factors
In this car accident case, the court ruled that accident reconstructionist Leonard Vaughan could testify about the visibility of headlights leading up to the crash based on his experience and review of evidence. However, his opinions that the defendant had a duty to fully stop at the intersection and that his employer was vicariously liable…
