Tag: methodology
-
Mortgage Expert Allowed to Testify Despite Not Updating the Earnings Model
The lawsuit concerns whether “Freddie Mac concealed its overextension in the nontraditional mortgage market—generally composed of instruments known as subprime mortgages or low credit and high risk instruments—and its materially deficient underwriting, risk management and fraud detection practices through misstatements and omissions to investors.” Plaintiff Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (“OPERS”) retained Howard Shapiro as…
-
Economic Damages Expert’s Reliance on Medical Opinions is Appropriate
This case stems from a vehicle collision that happened in July 2022 in Gallup, New Mexico. The Plaintiff, Jimmy Woodall claimed the crash caused severe and disabling injuries, including physical and emotional pain, permanent impairment, and reduced enjoyment of life. He sought compensation for medical costs, lost wages, and long-term care. Woodall retained an expert, Mr. Justin…
-
Otolaryngology Expert Testimony Excluded Due to Ruling Out COVID as Cause of Injuries
Carlos Gordoa and Ariani Reyes, along with their minor son, B.G., filed this personal injury action on May 16, 2022. Plaintiffs alleged that, while wearing his Apple AirPods Pro (1st generation) (“AirPods Pro”), their minor child B.G. experienced a transient, seconds-long exposure to an Amber Alert that apparently caused profound and permanent hearing loss in…
-
Orthopedic Surgery Expert’s Opinion on Future Damages Admitted
This case concerns a motor vehicle accident involving the Plaintiffs, Vanessa Rivera and her minor child K.C., and Joseph Giordano, a driver for Defendants Safway Services, LLC and Brand Safway Services, LLC. The Plaintiffs asserted four counts of negligence against the Defendants and sought damages for the physical, emotional, and financial injuries they allegedly suffered…
-
Radiology Expert Barred From Providing Testimony Related to Biomechanics
This automotive product liability case arises from a rear-end collision involving a 2020 Honda Odyssey (“subject vehicle”) that resulted in serious injuries to Plaintiff James Assey. On June 16, 2021, Plaintiffs James and Joan Assey were traveling in the subject vehicle on Interstate 26 near Columbia, South Carolina, at approximately 55 miles per hour when…
-
Engineering Expert’s Opinion on Cost Estimates Admitted
The Great Lakes Insurance Company issued a policy of insurance (the “Policy”) to Gulf Coast Bank and Trust (“Gulf Coast”) covering specific buildings owned by BRH Consultants, specifically, the Burbank Landing Apartments. Subsequently, BRH alleged that on August 29, 2021, Hurricane Ida caused damage to Buildings 1 and 2 of the property. Following this event,…
-
Ski Safety Expert Fails to Employ Experienced-Based Methodology Properly
On March 19, 2023, a ski collision at Aspen Highlands Ski Resort between Tasha Barber (Plaintiff) and Christine Mack (Defendant) led to a lawsuit. Barber claims Mack, skiing uphill, had the responsibility to avoid the collision and is seeking damages for her resulting injuries. Mack denies these claims and has engaged Jonathan Delk as an…
-
Human Factors Expert Lacks Expertise in the Context of Officer-Involved Shooting
Essentially, this case involves a civil rights and state tort claim stemming from the fatal shooting of Mickel Lewis, Sr., by Kern County Sheriff Deputy Jason Ayala on October 2, 2020. Therefore, the central legal question is whether Deputy Ayala’s use of deadly force was justified. Consequently, the Plaintiffs have filed a motion to exclude…
-
Accounting Expert’s Reliance upon a Disputed Fact does not Equate to Insufficient Facts
In a recent legal battle between Mo Pow and Crypto, the spotlight has fallen sharply on expert testimony, specifically the lost profits analysis provided by Mo Pow 4’s expert, David A. Hall. This case, fundamentally about two failed digital currency mining agreements, has turned into a fascinating examination of expert witness reliability and the challenges…
-
Neuropsychology Expert’s Opinions Discrediting the Body of False Confession Research Excluded
Essentially, Fulton and Mitchell alleged that they were wrongfully convicted of murder due to fabricated witness testimony and coerced false confessions by Chicago police officers. Consequently, they filed lawsuits claiming constitutional violations. As their trial date approached, the defense sought to introduce Dr. Diana Goldstein because of her extensive background, experience, and specialized knowledge as…
