Tag: Termination
-
Human Resources Expert Witness’ Testimony About Retaliation Excluded
Carol Stepien is a former employee of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”) in Seattle. She worked at the Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (“PMEL”), a lab within NOAA, an agency in the Department of Commerce. She contended that NOAA had discriminated against her based on her sex and age, subjected her to a hostile…
-
Vocational Rehabilitation Expert Witness’ Testimony about Reasonableness of Employment Termination Excluded
Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), filed suit against Defendant, the Defender Association of Philadelphia, alleging that the Defender Association failed to provide “M.P.” with a reasonable accommodation for her disability and terminated her employment in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). EEOC filed a motion to exclude the Defender Association’s expert,…
-
Testimony of Finance Expert Witness Limited Because It Is Based on the Assumption That Economic Damages Are Inclusive of Lost Wages
Plaintiff, Paul Sullivan was employed as a GSI Analyst II in the City’s Public Works Department. His employment was terminated as part of a reduction in force (“RIF”). During a restructuring of the Public Works Department, which led to the RIF, the City eliminated both of its GIS Analyst II positions, one of which was…
-
Court rejects the damages calculation of Economic Damages Expert Witness but allows him to opine on available employment opportunities for the Plaintiff in Employment Discrimination Suit
Plaintiff Rose Kochka had brought claims against West Penn Allegheny Health System Inc. (“WPAHS”) under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621, et seq., Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 P.S. §§ 951, et seq., and the Pittsburgh City Code, Article 5 §§ 651.01 et seq. These claims arose…
-
Court admitted the valuation expert reports presented by both parties in this case involving the termination of a wine distributorship agreement
In a wine distribution lawsuit, the court denied motions by both parties to exclude expert witness testimony. The court found most issues went to the weight of the evidence rather than admissibility. Citing the less stringent Daubert standard in a bench trial, the court expressed confidence in its ability to properly weigh even questionable expert…
