Tag: Unreliable
-
Engineering Expert was Allowed to Opine on Hurricane Damage
On August 27, 2020, Hurricane Laura made landfall in Southwest Louisiana. In the original complaint, The Pentecostal Church of DeQuincy (“TPCD”) alleged that it sustained damage from the Hurricane, and that Church Mutual has underestimated the cost of repairs. The five (5) buildings considered as “Covered Property” at issue in this litigation are identified as…
-
Hospitality Expert’s Testimony on Lost Investments Excluded
In this landlord-tenant dispute, Defendant Gator Flower Mound, LLC (“Gator”) asked the Court to exclude the damages testimony of Alan Someck, the expert witness designated by Plaintiff Arch & Eng, LLC (“Z Grill” or “Plaintiff”), as irrelevant and unreliable. Z Grill alleged economic injury due to problems with the premises it leased from Gator, the…
-
Transportation Expert Was Not Allowed to Opine on Hiring Practices
Plaintiff Casey A. Drake sued the Defendants Crete Carrier Corporation and Reuben Robert Shaffer for personal injuries arising from a vehicle collision. Drake was riding in a car driven by his niece, Erica Diehl. Shaffer was driving a tractor-trailer. As the two drivers passed a wrecked vehicle, they collided. Drake retained Robert Kelly and Jack…
-
Vocational Evaluation Expert Allowed to Opine on Lost Earning Capacity
This litigation arises from Plaintiff Raymond Flanks’ (“Plaintiff”) wrongful conviction for first-degree murder in 1985. Plaintiff alleged that the Orleans Parish District Attorney’s Office (“OPDA”) secured his wrongful conviction in violation of his constitutional rights by withholding material exculpatory evidence. Brandy Bradley is a vocational evaluator retained by Plaintiff to estimate the earnings he lost…
-
Economics Expert’s Testimony on Operating System Failures Excluded
It all started when the Plaintiffs, Lance and Kevin McCulloch, purchased Chandler Gas and Store on May 27, 2021. They alleged that the Marathon’s mandated point-of-sale, back-office management system, and computer system (collectively, the “Required Operations System’), which controlled both the gas pumps and registers in the C-store, frequently malfunctioned. The Plaintiffs claimed that they…
-
Psychology Expert’s Opinion on Social-Media-Facilitated Sex Trafficking Admitted
This case arises under the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA), which provides victims of sex trafficking a civil remedy against the perpetrators and beneficiaries of their trafficking. Plaintiff Doe (C.L.F.) filed this action to recover for alleged harm she experienced from being trafficked at a Motel 6 in Wichita, Kansas, that she claims was…
-
Expert Testimony on Legal Ethics Excluded
Robert I. Toussie alleged that he and his brother Michael entered into an agreement (the “Participation Agreement”) with Coastal Development, LLC (“Coastal”), an entity run by Richard Fields in 2000 to finance the development of casinos in Florida. However, Coastal/Fields promptly, and repeatedly, breached the terms of the Participation Agreement by not paying the Toussies…
-
Accident Reconstruction Expert’s Testimony on Human Factors Excluded
This case arises from a fatal automobile accident that occurred on September 22, 2017. Blake Haddox was traveling southbound on a motorcycle as Defendant Nicholas Roshon Moore drove a semi-truck in a northbound lane and turned left across traffic. The two collided, and Haddox died as a result. Plaintiffs planned to present the testimony and opinions of…
-
Transportation Safety Expert’s Testimony on Compliance with Federal Safety Regulations Admitted
This case concerns a motor vehicle collision that occurred between Plaintiff Bryan Russell Arnett (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Larry Tyrone Fairell, II (“Fairell”) on December 14, 2022. Fairell filed a motion to partially strike the testimony of Arnett’s retained transportation safety expert, David Hedgpeth. Transportation Safety Expert Witness David Hedgpeth is the principal owner of Hill…
-
Expert Testimony on Legitimate Marketing Practices Admitted
The Federal Trade Commission contended that Amazon tricked, coerced, and manipulated consumers into subscribing to Amazon Prime. According to the FTC, this was accomplished by failing to disclose the material terms of the subscription clearly and conspicuously and by failing to obtain the consumers’ informed consent before enrolling them. The FTC also alleged that Amazon…
