Author: Expert Witness Profiler
-
Experts are not obligated to present invoices, statements and documents in support of their testimony; Court refuses to exclude the testimony of Finance Expert Witness
Plaintiffs Rearden LLC and MOVA LLC (collectively “Rearden”) sued Defendants The Walt Disney Company and related entities Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group, Inc.; Walt Disney Pictures; Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Inc.; Marvel Studios LLC; Mandeville Films, Inc.; Infinity Productions LLC; and Assembled Productions II LLC (collectively “Disney”) for contributory copyright infringement, vicarious copyright infringement, and…
-
Experts cannot base their methods on personal experience unless it is proved to be a sufficient basis; Court excludes expert testimony on the cost of developing alleged trade secrets
This case was between Larada Sciences (the Plaintiff) and Pediatric Hair Solutions (PHS – the Defendant) in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. Larada manufactures devices that use heated air to treat head lice and licenses the devices to head lice treatment clinics. In 2015, Larada and PHS entered into license…
-
Experts are free to rely upon the opinions of other experts; Court limits the testimony of the Chiropractic Expert Witness on account of drawing impermissible conclusions
This case arises from a stroke allegedly caused by a chiropractic adjustment performed by Dr. Frederick Stinner. In February 2015, Justin Brutosky began experiencing chronic back, neck, and head pain. To treat these issues, he periodically saw Stinner, a chiropractor at Madison Avenue Chiropractic Center. From early 2015 to September 17, 2018, Stinner performed 39…
-
Evidence of Causation Necessary to Support Damages Theory; Court Limits Clashing Expert Testimony on Economic Damages
This copyright infringement case was brought by JBrick, LLC (“JBrick”) against Chazak Kinder, Inc., Chazak Distribution, Inc., Marav USA LLC, and Yaacov Schwartz (collectively “Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. JBrick alleged that the Defendants infringed on their copyright for a lego model of the Second Holy…
-
Modifications to an expert report are allowed as long as there are no additions or substantive changes whatsoever; Court limits the testimony of both parties’ experts regarding the customs brokerage industry
This case involves a dispute between JAS Supply, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Radiant Customs Services, Inc. and Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. (“Defendants”) regarding the importation of alcohol wipes from foreign manufacturers. In 2020, Plaintiff contracted with Defendants to assist with importing alcohol wipes into the United States for the first time. Defendant Radiant Global Logistics provided…
-
Court held that the original intent of the expert report does not serve as sufficient grounds for its exclusion but nevertheless rejected some of food safety expert’s conclusions which were not based on his expertise
In a legal dispute concerning recalled pet treats, the Court significantly limited the admission of expert opinions that merely restated established facts or summarized existing evidence. The Court’s decision emphasized that experts should not serve as individuals who determine facts or evaluate evidence on behalf of the jury. Only one expert opinion was permitted, specifically…
-
Court rejects expert testimony on unfair trade practices and consumer expectations regarding deodorants and antiperspirants; Closes Case
The Court granted Unilever’s motion to exclude expert testimony on unfair trade practices and consumer expectations regarding deodorants and antiperspirants after finding deficiencies in both the experts’ facts, data, and methodology. The sample sizes were too small and the data was ambiguous and incomplete. The testing methodology also yielded unpredictable results. Consumer expectations relevant to…
-
Disagreement among experts regarding methodology does not necessitate exclusion under Daubert; Nursing expert witness testimony on adequate staffing levels survives challenge
This case involved a putative class action lawsuit brought by Plaintiff Gail Parrish against Defendant Gordon Lane Healthcare, LLC (Gordon Lane), which operated a long-term skilled nursing facility where Parrish resided. Parrish, by and through his daughter and successor in interest, Monica Parrish, alleged that Gordon Lane failed to adequately staff the facility in violation…
-
Expert Fire Investigator’s testimony determining the point of origin and cause of the fire found reliable
The Court denied a Daubert motion to exclude a fire investigator’s testimony on the origin and cause of a destructive fire. It found the investigator qualified through extensive experience investigating fires. Minor flaws in his analysis provided fodder for cross-examination but did not warrant exclusion. Competing expert conclusions created a battle of the experts for…
-
Court limits expert testimony on crash reconstruction and its contributing factors
In this car accident case, the court ruled that accident reconstructionist Leonard Vaughan could testify about the visibility of headlights leading up to the crash based on his experience and review of evidence. However, his opinions that the defendant had a duty to fully stop at the intersection and that his employer was vicariously liable…
