Category: Accounting Expert Witness
-
Insurance Expert Allowed to Opine on Sales Tax Depreciation Practices
Plaintiffs Melissa Pitkin and Dan Grout own a home together in Healdsburg, California. They hold a homeowner’s insurance policy from State Farm, policy number 57-C4-6752-1 (the “Policy”), which covered certain losses to their home and all of its contents. The Policy included the “main policy form” (FP-7955, CA) as well as a “homeowners endorsement form”…
-
Expert Testimony on Deceptive Charges Excluded
Plaintiff Rickey Martin is a Florida resident who purchased corrective contact lenses from Defendant Lens.com’s website on five separate occasions between January and October, 2021. When making these online purchases, Plaintiff alleged that Lens.com charged him an undisclosed, unreasonable, and unlawful processing fee in violation of Florida’s Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act (the “FUDTPA”).…
-
Accounting Expert Was Partly Allowed to Opine on the Business Relationship
This case involves a contract dispute between the Douglas and Amy Mottram and Robert Radke. Prior to 2018, the Mottrams entered into four joint ventures with Radke, in which Radke would buy land in California, on which the Mottrams would construct homes to be resold for mutual profit. Beginning in 2018, the Mottrams and Radke…
-
Accounting Expert Not Allowed to Opine on Transition Period
Robert Webster allegedly owed fiduciary duties, including duties of loyalty and honesty, to his employer, CellMark. He was also subject to contractual obligations restricting him from competing with CellMark or soliciting its customers or employees on behalf of himself or others. According to CellMark, Webster began breaching these duties in 2023 after deciding to leave…
-
Accounting Experts’ Testimony on Exclusivity Agreement Limited
CellMark brought several claims against Dinah Bowman, Göran Sohl, andFortex Americas, LLC (collectively the “Fortex Defendants”), as well as Rob Webster arising out of the unamicable end of Webster’s employment at CellMark in 2024. Plaintiff CellMark, Inc. retained an expert, Jay Cunningham, to show that itsuffered various economic damages arising from its claims in this…
-
Accounting Expert Was Not Allowed to Opine on Damages to Uninsureds
This case centers on a landslide that occurred in May 2017 in the Cincinnati neighborhood of Mount Adams. At the time of the landslide, Plaintiff Metropolitan Design & Development, LLC (“MDD”) was insured under a commercial liability policy with Defendant Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company (“Frankenmuth”). MDD performed construction work in the vicinity of the landslide…
-
Plant Pathology Expert Allowed to Opine on HLVd Infection
Plaintiff is a Delaware limited liability business suing multiple individuals and related trusts for securities fraud arising out of a transaction in which Defendants allegedly induced Plaintiff to purchase over $25 million of Devi Holdings stock through fraudulent misrepresentations about Devi’s financial condition and unpaid tax liabilities. Devi Holdings was a business engaged in engaged…
-
Accounting Expert Was Not Fully Allowed to Opine on Calculated Future Lost Profits
Plaintiff Barrett Business Services, Inc. (“BBSI”) is a human resources management company that contracts with small and medium-sized businesses to provide human resource management solutions, including temporary staffing and professional services. It provided these services to employers throughout the Yakima area and particularly to fruit growers and other agricultural companies. On April 23, 2014, BBSI…
-
Accounting Expert Was Allowed to Opine on the Lease Auditing Process
600 Cleveland owned a commercial office building located at 600 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, Florida 33601 from September 9, 2013, to April 1, 2024. Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) and 600 Cleveland assumed a lease agreement originally entered into by other parties on December 1, 1986, and both were bound by the agreement. This lawsuit arises…
-
Accounting Expert’s Lost-Opportunity Testimony Admitted
Plaintiffs Joshua Cane Jellison and Jessica Marie Jellison (collectively “Plaintiffs”) alleged violations of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, against PHH Mortgage Corporation, the assignee and servicer of their mortgage loan. Plaintiffs claimed that they entered into a COVID-19 forbearance, which caused them to accrue past due payments. According to Plaintiffs, PHH…
