Category: Accounting Expert Witness
-
Rule 26 Met: Accounting Expert’s Report Provided the Correct Kind of Appendix
Ink 477, LLC and Grove Ink, LLC, operating the Miami restaurant and bar “Amal” and “Level 6,” are accused by former employee Jose Petersen of violating the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Petersen, who worked as waitstaff at Amal from June to September 2022 and then at Level 6 from May to September 2023, claims…
-
Accounting Expert Allowed to Testify Despite Lacking Forensic Accounting Expertise
This case involves a dispute over the alleged misuse of funds from two New Mexico payday lending businesses, Cashco, Inc. and Budget Payday Loans, L.P. The Light Defendants (John Ernest Light, Tina S. Light, and Investors Services, Inc.) were hired to manage the financial operations of these businesses, including record-keeping and transaction processing. They were…
-
Accounting Expert’s Reliance upon a Disputed Fact does not Equate to Insufficient Facts
In a recent legal battle between Mo Pow and Crypto, the spotlight has fallen sharply on expert testimony, specifically the lost profits analysis provided by Mo Pow 4’s expert, David A. Hall. This case, fundamentally about two failed digital currency mining agreements, has turned into a fascinating examination of expert witness reliability and the challenges…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Calculations of Lost Profits and Plow-Down Costs Survives Daubert Challenge
Polypack sued Nestlé for breach of contract and breach of implied covenant of good faith, claiming Nestlé failed to make final payments for equipment and service fees. Nestlé counterclaimed, alleging defective equipment and failure to meet performance requirements, resulting in significant financial losses, including lost profits, additional labor costs, and storage fees. Nestlé retained David…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Opinions About the Unpaid Consulting Fees Excluded
In early 2015, Plaintiffs, US Thrillrides, LLC (“USTR”) and Polercoaster, LLC began discussions with Defendant, Intamin Amusement Rides Int. Corp. Est. about partnering to build Polercoasters for Plaintiffs’ customers. The “Polercoaster” is “a roller coaster that is supported or suspended from a vertical tower instead of moving along a horizontal track.” This case arises from a…
-
Accounting Expert Witness Reliably Concludes That There Is No Common Value Ascribed to Points Universally
Plaintiffs, Angelique L. Lingard and Sudarien D. Smith brought this proposed consumer class action on behalf of themselves and other military servicemembers who are similarly situated against Defendants Holiday Inn Club Vacations, Inc. f/k/a Orange Lake Country Club, Inc. (“HICV”) for alleged violations of the Military Lending Act. Plaintiffs and the proposed class members purchased…
-
Opinions of the Geology Expert Witness Regarding Copying of the Patented Technology Excluded
This case involves an alleged breach of a non-disclosure agreement (the NDA) and patent infringement stemming from the management, construction, and operation of a large lagoon in St. George, Utah (the Lagoon) by Defendants, Desert Color Manager, LLC, Desert Color St. George, LLC, and Pacific Aquascape International, Inc. Specifically, Plaintiffs Crystal Lagoons U.S. Corp. and…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Testimony on Firing Personnel and Cutting Costs Post-Closing Admitted
Plaintiffs Weston D. McArtor (“McArtor”) and BEI Services, Inc. (“BEI Services”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), brought this civil action against the Defendants Valsoft Corporation Inc. (“Valsoft”) and Aspire USA, LLC dba Aspire Software (“Aspire”) (collectively, “Buyers” or Defendants”). This action involved the sale of Plaintiffs’ business, Nexera, to Defendants. Prior to the acquisition, Nexera was in the business of…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Disgorgement Analysis Using Full Absorption Method Admitted
Plaintiff Multiple Energy Technologies, LLC (“MET”) accused Under Armour of false advertising in relation to certain products that contain bioceramic powder. MET contended that Under Armour inaccurately claimed that the Federal Food and Drug Administration had determined that those products enhanced recovery. Under Armour sells activewear and sleepwear products directly to consumers. This includes the…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Testimony on Damages Admitted Because it Includes Independent Analysis
Plaintiff American Power, LLC (“AMP”) is a trucking-logistics company headquartered in Dayton, Ohio. According to the Complaint, Plaintiff invested in and loaned $450,000 to Defendant Dektrix LLC, a transportation-servicing company headquartered in Utah. The Complaint charges that the investment and loan were fraudulently obtained and ultimately worthless. Plaintiff sought to impose liability upon Dektrix and…
