Category: Orthopaedic Surgery Expert Witness
-
Orthopaedic Surgery Expert Witness’ Testimony about the Severity of the Collision Admitted
A district judge in Nebraska admitted the testimony of an orthopedic spine surgeon despite lacking the required education, training and experience in physics, engineering, accident reconstruction or biomechanics. Plaintiffs, Lisa Rentz Johnson and George Johnson, have brought a personal injury lawsuit involving an accident between two tractor-trailers in a parking lot. Lisa alleged she sustained…
-
Materials Science and Orthopedic Surgery Experts analyze Hip Implant Failure
Pamela Ahmed has a history of back problems dating back to a traffic accident in approximately 1988. By 2020, Ahmed had a litany of “bad orthopedic issues,” leading her doctor to deem her an “orthopedic disaster.” She began to experience significant hip arthritis, and her doctor diagnosed her with end-stage osteoarthritis. Ahmed underwent a right…
-
Court rejects Causation Opinions offered by Expert Witnesses with regard to Injuries caused by an Allegedly Exploding Fluorescent Lamp on account of Lack of Adequate Testing and Investigation of the Accident
This case involves a lawsuit filed by Donald F. Greene and Nicole F. Greene (“Plaintiffs”) against Ledvance LLC (“Defendant”) regarding injuries Donald Greene sustained when a fluorescent light bulb he was changing allegedly exploded. The incident occurred on June 11, 2020 at Donald Greene’s workplace. According to the allegations, On June 11, 2020, Donald Greene,…
-
Court limits the testimony of Life Care Planning Expert Witness citing reliance on the inadmissible opinions of an undisclosed expert
This case involved a lawsuit filed by Louis Edward Hill against Century Arms, Inc. and Century International Arms, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”) relating to a pistol that allegedly unintentionally discharged when it fell out of its holster, resulting in injury to Hill’s knee. On November 28, 2017, the Plaintiff purchased a Canik TP9SF Elite model pistol.…
-
Orthopedic expert testimony on causation survives unreliable methodology challenge in Louisiana
The District Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to exclude the testimony of Defendant’s expert Dr. Millet. Though Dr. Millet did not examine the Plaintiff and made some factual assumptions, the Court found his methodology of reviewing medical records combined with his experience was sufficiently reliable under Daubert. The Court held disputes over the basis for an…
