Category: Expert Challenges
-
Court Bars Intellectual Property Expert Witness for Opining on Straightforward Matters of Law
A district judge in New York held that the report of a intellectual property expert witness spoke to straightforward areas of the law where juries did not require assistance. Plaintiff Medical Depot, Inc. and Defendant Med Way US, Inc. are both manufacturers of medical products, including specially designed medical air mattresses. Medical Depot, Inc. began selling various air…
-
Trade Secrets Expert Witness’ Testimony Based on his own Experience Admitted
A district judge in Texas admitted the testimony of a trade secrets expert witness, taking into consideration his extensive and specialized experience. Plaintiff BHI, a leader in the energy industry providing project management and staffing support to the nuclear, fossil, wind, hydro, and government energy markets accused the Defendants KVP Energy Services, Dustin Coble, Welborn…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Opinions on Due Diligence Procedures Admitted
A district judge in Mississippi held that the accounting expert witness was more than qualified to testify about the due diligence requirements in the stock purchase agreement in question. Facts of the case: Casey Morgan (“Morgan”) and Jimmy Ward (“Ward”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) previously owned and operated Bigfoot Land Services, Inc. (“Bigfoot” or “the company”), an…
-
Credit Reporting Expert Witness’ Opinions Based on his Experience And Research In Understanding Credit Score Risk-Analysis Admitted
A district judge in Florida admitted the opinions of a credit reporting expert witness after ruling that his opinions were an application of industry standards to facts that, if proven, might have helped demonstrate the satisfaction of Fair Credit Reporting Act standards by implication. Facts of the Case Plaintiff, Pablo Antonio Garcia (“Garcia”), as the…
-
Architecture Expert Witness Fails to Establish the Reliability of his Stability Testing Methodology
A district judge in Louisiana limited the testimony of a renowned architect, citing a complete failure to explain the origin of his methodology or to point to scientific support for the technique that reliably predicts the likelihood that a canopy on display in a store is dangerous, despite his years of experience. To begin with,…
-
Economics Expert Witness’ Testimony Based on Well-Tested Methods for Establishing Classwide Damages Admitted
A district judge in California refused to exclude the testimony of an expert economist despite objections raised against his methods for establishing classwide damages. The expert economist had adequately explained why his damages analysis would provide an accurate and common method to prove classwide damages. The Plaintiff contended that the Defendant Williams-Sonoma, Inc., and its…
-
Pathology Expert Witness’ Testimony Excluded Due to Rampant Plagiarism
A district judge barred Harvard pathologist from testifying because his report was merely a wholesale adoption of International Agency for Research on Cancer’s (“IARC”) findings under the guise of his own expertise. In this toxic tort case that is part of a suite of companion cases, more than sixty Plaintiffs allege that Defendant Lockheed Martin…
-
Podiatry Expert Witness’ Testimony Based on a Meaningful Connection between her Experience and the Cause of Injury Admitted
Florida Southern District Court decided that a podiatry expert witness’ causation theory with regard to severe burns was admissible after she compared and contrasted the Plaintiff’s health before and after the incident. This is a negligence action in admiralty for damages the Plaintiff suffered while vacationing aboard the Explorer of The Seas on May 14, 2022. The…
-
Management Consulting Expert Witness’ Opinions on Market Valuation of a Trademark Excluded
This is a case under New York’s Debtor & Creditor law to set aside a February 2019 transfer of the “Halston” and “Halston Heritage” trademarks to Defendants. Comfortex, a garment manufacturer based in Hong Kong alleged that Xcel had used its domination over House of Halston (“HOH”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries (defined below as…
-
Testimony of Mechanical Engineering Expert Witnesses Held to be Based on Thorough Review and Adequate Testing of the Product
Plaintiff India Smith (“Plaintiff”) filed this product liability lawsuit against Tabletops Unlimited, Inc. d/b/a TTU’s (“TTU”) on August 1, 2022. Plaintiff sought to recover damages from an August 24, 2020 incident in which she sustained burns on her chest, upper abdomen, and legs after her Pressure Cooker ejected hot contents on her when she tried to open…
