Category: Expert Challenges
-
Court rejects the testimony of Human Factors Engineering Expert Witness after concluding jury cannot receive appreciable help from her “inconsistent” testimony
The case in question involves a lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff, Clyde Arterburn, against Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (referred to as Home Depot) for injuries sustained when he tripped and fell in a Home Depot store on September 21, 2020. According to the documents, Arterburn claims that he tripped over a metal basket holder that…
-
Experts could rely on reliable “other sources” and even hearsay to offer their opinions; Court notes before admitting part of Marketing Expert Witness’ testimony
The lawsuit was a trademark infringement action filed by Forest River, Inc. against inTech Trailers, Inc. It sought injunctive relief, damages, costs, attorneys’ fees, and any other appropriate remedies. The legal action arose from inTech’s knowing and intentional infringement of Forest River’s DELLA TERRA trademark and its mountain design trademark, (“Forest River Mountain Design”) (Forest…
-
“Unexplained” Methodology employed by Accounting Expert Witness passes Daubert Test after Court notes that merits and drawbacks of the Methodology have been discussed
Plaintiffs BRP Colleague Inc. (“BRP Colleague”) and Baldwin Krystyn Sherman Partners, LLC (“BKS”) jointly referred to as “BRP,” had initiated legal proceedings against Defendants Edward (Teddy) Gillen (“Gillen”) and Edgewood Partners Insurance Center Inc. (“EPIC”) concerning Gillen’s prior association with BRP and his subsequent employment with EPIC, a direct competitor of BRP. BRP (together with…
-
Occupational Medicine Expert Witness’ projection of Plaintiff’s future medical care costs rejected by the Court for lacking sufficient basis in the medical evidence
Plaintiff Autumn Brown, who was twenty-two years old at the time, sustained injuries on June 24, 2020 after a vehicle driven by an employee of Defendant BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC struck her vehicle at an intersection in Pascagoula, Mississippi. She was taken to the emergency department at Singing River Hospital where they found she had suffered…
-
Court validates the objective findings of the statistics expert witness in this class action lawsuit consisting of disability discrimination claims
This case originated from a class action lawsuit filed by the Center for Independence of the Disabled, New York and other nonprofit organizations (collectively referred to as Plaintiffs) against the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA), New York City Transit Authority (“NYC Transit”), and the City of New York(“the City”) (collectively referred to as Defendants). The lawsuit…
-
Geotechnical Engineering Expert Witness’ testimony does not fully pass Daubert Scrutiny as Court rejects his legal conclusions on contractual responsibilities
This case is centered around a contractual dispute between Greenup Industries, LLC (“Greenup”), the general contractor, and Five S Group, LLC (“Five S”), the subcontractor, along with the involvement of Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”), related to excavation work on a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”) project. In 2020, Greenup was awarded a contract…
-
Racially Polarized Voting Analysis of Voting Expert Witness found to satisfy the Daubert requirements in light of anticipated changes
Plaintiff, Black Louisiana voters, alongside nonprofit organizations advocating for civic engagement and social equality, filed this lawsuit formally accusing the Defendants, specifically Secretary of State R. Kyle Ardoin, and Intervenor-Defendant, the State of Louisiana, through Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry (collectively, “Movants”) of having violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Section…
-
Court upholds the reliance of Biomedical Engineering Expert Witness on MAUDE data but rejects his opinions on medical causation
Plaintiff Terry Jennings-Moline filed this lawsuit against Defendants DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and related Johnson & Johnson entities. The case stems from hip replacement surgery Jennings-Moline underwent in January 2016, when her surgeon, Dr. Douglas McInnis, implanted a Pinnacle hip implant containing an AltrX polyethene acetabular liner (AltrX liner) made by Defendants. In February 2018, McInnis…
-
Credentials and subjective opinion alone found insufficient for admitting expert testimony; Court rejects the testimony of transportation safety expert witness in personal injury suit
In a recent update, the Court has vindicated James E. Lewis by noting that it did not doubt Lewis’ experience and insights into the trucking industry. Read our updated coverage here: https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/james-e-lewis-transportation-safety-expert-witness-stands-vindicated-judge-confirms-exclusion-was-procedural-and-unfortunate In response to our coverage of this court opinion, we received the following response from James Lewis, the expert witness referenced in this…
-
Court admits the testimony of Toxicology Expert Witness on account of basing her conclusions regarding the Decedent’s Comparative Fault and Intoxication on a reliable premise in Wrongful Death Suit
The Plaintiff, Herbert Johnson, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Herbert Johnson III, had brought this action pursuant to the Section 768.21, Florida Statutes (the Florida Wrongful Death Act), alleging that East Coast Waffles d/b/a Waffle House (hereafter, “Waffle House”) negligently owned, controlled, managed, or maintained the premises where his son, Herbert Johnson…
