Category: Expert Challenges
-
Forensic Expert Was Allowed to Opine on the Object’s Purported Visible Shape and Silhouette
This suit arises from the death of Plaintiffs Mónica E. Gonzalez-Lopez’s and José L. Rodríguez-Sánchez’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) son, Christian José Rodríguez-González (Rodríguez), who was shot and killed during a police chase carried out by Defendants Officer Alberto Robles-Concepción (“Robles”) and Officer Emanual Ramos-Pabón (“Ramos”) on July 15, 2022. Plaintiffs Monica E. Gonzalez-Lopez and Jose L.…
-
History Expert’s Testimony on Discriminatory Motivations Admitted
For well over a century, the Commonwealth of Virginia has disobeyed a federal law designed to protect the right of former enslaved people to vote. When the United States started to readmit the rebellious slave states after the Civil War, Congress feared that the former Confederate powers would invent new crimes with which they could…
-
Petroleum Engineering Expert’s Testimony on Offshore Rig Operations Admitted
This matter concerns an incident aboard the Valaris 144 while the vessel was performing offshore drilling services in the Gulf of Mexico off the Louisiana coast. Caleb Kittrell worked as a roustabout for Ensco Offshore on board the vessel owned by Rowan Offshore Luxembourg. On December 27, 2023, Kittrell was instructed to disconnect a jet…
-
Safety Expert’s Clarified Opinions Excluded
This case arises out of a slip-and-fall incident that occurred at US Bank’s branch office in Kirkland, Washington, on December 7, 2020. Carol Hummel alleges that she fell in the parking lot and suffered injuries as a result of US Bank’s failure to maintain its premises in a reasonably safe condition. Defendants U.S. Bancorp and…
-
Accounting Expert Was Allowed to Opine on the Lease Auditing Process
600 Cleveland owned a commercial office building located at 600 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, Florida 33601 from September 9, 2013, to April 1, 2024. Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) and 600 Cleveland assumed a lease agreement originally entered into by other parties on December 1, 1986, and both were bound by the agreement. This lawsuit arises…
-
Ski Safety Expert was Allowed to Opine on the Use of Blue Fencing
This case arises from a skiing accident that occurred at Mountain Creek’s ski resort (“the Resort”). On February 21, 2021, Pierino Perciballi and his sixteen-year-old son Matteo Perciballi chose to ski down the Matchmaker trail, an intermediate difficulty terrain park course contained within the Resort. The Matchmaker trail is adjacent to the Resort’s “learning area.”…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Jail Policies
Billy Joe Altstatt, acting as the brother and legal guardian of Johnny Altstatt, an incapacitated individual, filed suit against the Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County and the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, alleging violations of Johnny’s federal and state constitutional rights. Defendants Board of County Commissioners for Oklahoma County and Oklahoma County Criminal…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Chemical Munitions
Wesley Cotton alleged that on March 19, 2022, an incident occurred on Yard 3C at California State Prison, Corcoran (“CSP-Corcoran”), in which officers deployed multiple chemical agents, including oleoresin capsicum (“OC”), chloroacetophenone (“CN”), chlorobenzalmalononitrile (“CS”) grenades (collectively, “chemical agents”) to stop a fight between third party prisoners. At the time the chemical agents were deployed,…
-
Law Enforcement Expert’s Testimony on the Use of Pepper Spray Limited
Plaintiff LaBlanca Sibley’s excessive force claim against Officer Nicholas S. Riggall, arising from her arrest and detention, was based on Riggall’s use of pepper spray while she was seated in the patrol car. Sibley retained Mr. Jeronimo Rodriguez, an expert in law enforcement practices and use-of-force standards. Riggall moved to exclude Rodriguez’s opinions and testimony.…
-
Law Enforcement Expert’s Testimony on Workplace Dynamics Admitted
Solangie Acosta was a Muskegon Heights Police Department(“MHPD”) law enforcement officer between 2017 and 2022 who brought nine claims against her former employer, alleging discrimination on the basis of sex, disability status, and an exercise of her worker’s compensation rights. Defendants filed a motion to preclude testimony by Acosta’s expert Wendy Patrick, a former prosecutor…
