Category: Expert Challenges
-
Engineering Expert’s Testimony on Metal Roofing Degradation Admitted
This case is a breach of good faith and fair dealing and breach of contract due to Defendant CSAA General Insurance Company denying Plaintiff George Richardson’s roof damage claim that occurred on September 23, 2023. Defendant filed a Daubert motion to exclude the testimony of Plaintiff’s expert witness, Michael Pruitt. Engineering Expert Witness Michael Pruitt,…
-
Emergency Medicine Expert Barred From Testifying Due to His Admitted Lack of Knowledge
Plaintiff Emilee Bradley sued Defendants BSL Express Trucking, Inc. and Fatkhuddin Kurbonov in Jefferson Circuit Court, alleging various claims arising from an automobile accident involving Bradley and Fatkhuddin Kurbonov. Intervening Plaintiff Shawna Broyles (hereinafter “Broyles”) was a passenger of Plaintiff Bradley’s vehicle. Defendants filed a motion to exclude the opinion of Broyles’ proffered expert, Dr.…
-
Expert Testimony Limited in Identity Theft Credit Reporting Dispute
Oleksandr Panchenko, a Ukrainian national, first entered the U.S. in 2009 on a J-1 visa and received a Social Security Number. He lived intermittently in the U.S. until 2019, then returned permanently in April 2023 for work. In May 2023, he discovered over $120,000 in fraudulent accounts on his credit report, including unauthorized cards, bank…
-
Civil Engineering Expert Employed a Reliable Methodology for Segregating Damages
In this insurance coverage dispute, Plaintiff Will Properties Inc. brought claims against Defendant Century Surety Company for breach of contract, common law bad faith, and violations of the Texas Insurance Code. Plaintiff alleged that its exhibition center in Harker Heights, Texas was covered by Defendant’s policy, which included hail and windstorm coverage, from November 1,…
-
Legal Expert Allowed to Testify Despite His Lack of Particularized Expertise
The Federal Trade Commission contended that Amazon tricked, coerced, and manipulated consumers into subscribing to Amazon Prime. According to the FTC, this was accomplished by failing to disclose the material terms of the subscription clearly and conspicuously and by failing to obtain the consumers’ informed consent before enrolling them. The FTC also alleged that Amazon…
-
Human Factors Expert’s Testimony on Dark Patterns Excluded
The Federal Trade Commission contended that Amazon tricked, coerced, and manipulated consumers into subscribing to Amazon Prime. According to the FTC, this was accomplished by failing to disclose the material terms of the subscription clearly and conspicuously and by failing to obtain the consumers’ informed consent before enrolling them. The FTC also alleged that Amazon…
-
Relying on Personal Intuition Is Not a Valid Methodology for an Entertainment Industry Expert
This copyright infringement action concerns two musical works: Plaintiff, Rene Lorente Garcia’s 1998 song Algo Diferente (“AD”), and the 2021 track Don’t Be Shy (“DBS”), performed by Tijs Michiel Verwest (“Tiësto”) and Carolina Giraldo-Navarro (“Karol G”). Plaintiff brought two claims: direct infringement against Karol G and Tiësto (“Count I”); and contributory and vicarious infringement against Atlantic Recording Corporation (“Atlantic”),…
-
Expert Testimony Survives Daubert Challenge in Surgical Mesh Injury Case
Connie Thacker (Plaintiff) received two surgical mesh devices, Prolift and TVT-Secur, as implants on May 8, 2009. Both devices were manufactured by Ethicon, Inc. and were designed to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence in women. Later, Thacker sued, alleging damages resulting from the use of these devices and identified Elizabeth Laposata as her “Case-Specific…
-
Law Enforcement Expert’s Testimony Regarding the Standard of Care in an Involuntary Detention Setting Admitted
This case arises out of Plaintiff Gregory Palm’s claim that he received deficient medical care while incarcerated in the Jones County Jail and Baldwin County Detention Center. Sheriff Butch Reese, Captain Shane Moody, Lieutenant Brent Skinner, and Lieutenant Dalton Hart (hereinafter “Defendants”) disclosed Kathryn Wild and Paul Cappitelli as expert witnesses. Plaintiff Gregory Palm filed…
-
Neuropsychology Expert’s Testimony on Marijuana Use Admitted
This is a product liability case arising from a motorcycle accident. Plaintiff Cameron Woodall alleged that on September 9, 2022, he was severely injured while wearing a motorcycle helmet allegedly designed and manufactured by Defendants Yohe Helmet Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and Foshan City Nanhai Yongheng Helmet Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; and distributed and sold by Defendant…
