Tag: Damages
-
Economics Expert’s Opinions on the Outcome-Based Compensation Structure Excluded
Allstate Insurance Company sells property, casualty, and life insurance in California through independent and exclusive agents. The Plaintiffs, who were exclusive agents for the Defendant from 1990 to 2023 and had signed Exclusive Agency Agreements, have filed a class-action lawsuit. Their claim centers on unreimbursed business expenses they incurred, including costs for rent, internet, licensed…
-
Law And Legal Expert Was Not Allowed to Testify Regarding State Law Ethical Standards
Plaintiff Kuantay Reeder filed a civil rights lawsuit against Jason Williams, the Orleans Parish District Attorney, in his official capacity. Reeder had spent more than 26 years in prison following a wrongful conviction for murder. He claimed the Orleans Parish District Attorney’s Office (OPDA) violated his right to due process by failing to disclose exculpatory…
-
Psychiatry Expert’s Testimony Rejected for Injecting Subjective Characterizations
On September 3, 2020, Plaintiffs Dalila Yeend and Bounnam Phimasone (together with Elvin Minaya Rodriguez, Lisa LaPointe, and Shantadewie Rhamee, “Plaintiffs”) commenced this action against Akima Global Services, LLC a/k/a AGS (“AGS” or “Defendant”) in New York State Supreme Court, asserting state law claims pertaining to their civil immigration detention at the Buffalo Federal Detention…
-
Economics Expert Allowed to Testify Despite Lacking Experience in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Named Plaintiffs Judy Kirkbride and Beeta Lewis are consumers in Ohio and Texas that purchased prescription drugs from The Kroger Company (“Kroger”) in the last several years. They alleged that Kroger, through a deceptive pricing scheme, overcharged them for prescription drugs by misreporting the “usual and customary” (U&C) prices for Plaintiffs’ medications, which resulted in…
-
Psychology Expert Witness is Unqualified to Testify as to Reputational Damages
On June 15, 2020, Michael J. Fitzgerald and Ronda and Will McNae finalized a Settlement Agreement to resolve claims related to alleged rape and sexual assault. This agreement included Fitzgerald paying a sum of money and, in return, the McNaes releasing their claims, agreeing not to contact Fitzgerald’s employer, SoftwareONE, refrain from writing about him…
-
Accounting Expert Allowed to Testify Despite Lacking Forensic Accounting Expertise
This case involves a dispute over the alleged misuse of funds from two New Mexico payday lending businesses, Cashco, Inc. and Budget Payday Loans, L.P. The Light Defendants (John Ernest Light, Tina S. Light, and Investors Services, Inc.) were hired to manage the financial operations of these businesses, including record-keeping and transaction processing. They were…
-
Accounting Expert’s Reliance upon a Disputed Fact does not Equate to Insufficient Facts
In a recent legal battle between Mo Pow and Crypto, the spotlight has fallen sharply on expert testimony, specifically the lost profits analysis provided by Mo Pow 4’s expert, David A. Hall. This case, fundamentally about two failed digital currency mining agreements, has turned into a fascinating examination of expert witness reliability and the challenges…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Calculations of Lost Profits and Plow-Down Costs Survives Daubert Challenge
Polypack sued Nestlé for breach of contract and breach of implied covenant of good faith, claiming Nestlé failed to make final payments for equipment and service fees. Nestlé counterclaimed, alleging defective equipment and failure to meet performance requirements, resulting in significant financial losses, including lost profits, additional labor costs, and storage fees. Nestlé retained David…
-
Financial Interest & Expert Testimony: When Conflict Arises
The Plaintiff, a synagogue and broadcasting station, filed an insurance claim with Defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company for damage to their custom slate roof caused by a windstorm. They hired Peter Ridulfo of Claims Pro Public Adjusters to assist with the claim. Ridulfo’s compensation was a contingent fee, tied to the amount recovered in the…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Opinions About the Unpaid Consulting Fees Excluded
In early 2015, Plaintiffs, US Thrillrides, LLC (“USTR”) and Polercoaster, LLC began discussions with Defendant, Intamin Amusement Rides Int. Corp. Est. about partnering to build Polercoasters for Plaintiffs’ customers. The “Polercoaster” is “a roller coaster that is supported or suspended from a vertical tower instead of moving along a horizontal track.” This case arises from a…
