Tag: Disclosure
-
Court Strikes Structural Engineering Expert Witness’ Testimony on Hurricane Damage Citing Month-Long Disclosure Delay
Philip and Nancy Fairman’s home sustained severe flooding during Hurricane Ian. After the storm, they filed a damage claim with their insurer, Defendant American Strategic Insurance Corp (“ASI”), to seek compensation for the losses. ASI acknowledged coverage but disputed the extent of the damage. When the Fairmans and ASI could not reach a settlement, the…
-
Extensive and Complicated Report by Architecture Expert Witness Admitted Despite Claims of Insufficient Disclosure
In 2015, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff C70 Builders, Inc. contracted with Plaintiff Mid-South Outlet Shops, LLC c/o Tanger Management, LLC for the construction of the Tanger Outlets Southaven, an open-air mall in Southaven, Mississippi. The Mall opened in November 2015. According to C70, the first design modifications were subsequently installed at several buildings on the Project by C70…
-
Testimony of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Expert Witness Concerning Plaintiff’s Life Care Plan Is Not Entirely Based on Speculation
Plaintiff Towanda R. Futrell filed this personal injury action on August 28, 2023. The action arises from a motor vehicle accident on Interstate 64 on December 16, 2022, when a tractor-trailer owned by AV Leasing, LLC, leased by Triton Logistics, Inc., and driven by Daniel Cramer, collided with a bus on which Futrell was a…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Witness’ Disclosure Held to be Inadequate
This case deals with the indictment of Derik Carothers. He is charged with three offenses. At Count One, the grand jury charged him with conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute a quantity of cocaine base, in the form commonly known as crack, a Schedule II controlled substance. At Count Two, the grand…
-
Intellectual Property Expert Witness Cannot Cloak her Testimony on Validity with her Experience
EPP and Paveloc both construct and sell “erosion prevention” systems that are used in retaining walls. The systems are made up of interlocking hiocks. EPP has a patent on its “Channel Lock II block” (US Patent No. 8,123,435) (“the 435 patent”). At some point the business relationship soured. Paveloc stopped making the EPP product and began…
-
Late Service of Psychology Expert Witness’ Report Might Cause Severe Prejudice
Plaintiff, Rudolph Mills filed this action against Defendant, Steuben Foods, Inc., alleging employment discrimination based on race after numerous complaints about shocking and wildly inappropriate racial slurs used against him by supervisors and managers. Defendants moved, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(f)(1)(C), 26(a)(2)(A), (D), 37(c)(1)(C), for an order striking the expert report of Mark D. Lerner, PhD.…
-
Accident Reconstruction Expert Barred From Testifying Due to Surprise Opinions
Elmedin Tinjak has been a life-long cyclist. On June 20, 2020, the carbon fiber fork of his brand-new Bianchi bicycle failed, causing him to crash face-first on the pavement. Tinjak was taken to Riverside Methodist Hospital, where he was treated for a concussion, chest contusions, a fractured vertebra, and multiple complex facial lacerations. The injuries…
-
Economics Expert Witness Employs a “Before and After” Methodology to Quantify Plaintiff’s Damages
This action arises out of an alleged October 22, 2016 arrest and subsequent criminal prosecution of Plaintiff, which concluded with Plaintiff’s conviction for misdemeanor battery upon Officer Ermeri. On October 20, 2020, Plaintiff Richard John Lucibella (“Lucibella”) filed a nine-count complaint in state court against Officer Richard Ermeri (“Ermeri”), Officer Savino (“Savino”), and the Town…
-
Criminal Law Expert Witness’ Disclosure Fails to Comply with Rule 16 Requirements with Respect to Three Bullet Points
In a white-collar criminal case where Defendants were charged with conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud in a pump-and-dump scheme through a publicly traded company, Defendants Paul Spivak and Olga Smirnova filed a motion to exclude the testimony of Peter Melley under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Melley is…
-
Insurance Expert Witness’ Testimony About the Industry Norms and Customs of the Insurance Adjustment Process Admitted
This claim arises from 2B’s negligent handing of an auto insurance claim brought by Harold and Milagros Lacey against GoAuto insureds, Alisha and Kayranasia Hill resulting from a motor vehicle accident in Panama City Beach, FL on July 31, 2020 (the “Lacey Claim”). GoAuto is a Louisiana-based insurance company that writes policies in Louisiana, Texas,…
