Tag: Legal Conclusion
-
Law Enforcement Expert Witness’ Testimony on Officers’ Actions Excluded
The present lawsuit revolves around Plaintiff Van Aelsytn’s claims of civil rights violations and malicious prosecution against Defendants Coleman Sparks and Scott Carnes. Both Defendants were officers with the Versailles Police Department and were involved in an investigation that led to domestic violence charges against Van Aelsytn. However, the Plaintiff possessed evidence suggesting his innocence.…
-
Employment Law Expert Witness’ Opinion Regarding the Application of the MCA Exemption Excluded
Plaintiffs, currently or formerly employed by Defendants as lawn and landscape workers, bring this class and collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and state law, alleging that Defendants failed to pay overtime compensation for all hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek. Defendants have retained Brian Farrington to provide an expert…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Witness Prohibited From Testifying About the Existence of Probable Cause For Arrest
On February 26, 2024, the Defendant David Boruchowitz, a Deputy Sheriff with the Nye County Sheriff’s Office (NCSO), collaborated with Ken Johnson, a former Valley Electric Association (VEA) employee to arrest Angela Evans, the then-CEO of the Valley Electric Association (“VEA”), the entity responsible for providing power to residents of Nye County. Ken Johnson was…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Witness Testimony on LAPD’s Compliance with Policies and Procedures Deemed Relevant
This matter involves an incident that occurred on May 29, 2020, while Plaintiff, David Zuniga was present during the George Floyd protests in Grand Park, Downtown Los Angeles. During this time, Zuniga and his experts contended that he was struck with a nonlethal projectile to his head by Defendant Officer Aaron Green. Officer Green, and…
-
Structural Engineering Expert Witness’ Testimony Admitted Despite His Lack of Specific Experience in Designing Pools
This case involves claims raised by Plaintiffs Kyle and Annaleah Justice against Defendants Bestway USA and Rural King Holdings, Inc. under the Missouri Wrongful Death Statute. Plaintiffs’ claims arose from the drowning death of their minor daughter, E.M.J., in an above-ground pool on August 3, 2019. Plaintiffs raised five claims against Bestway USA: Count I…
-
Electrical Engineering Expert Witness’ Testimony Admitted Despite Lack of Independent Testing
Raytheon Company (“Raytheon” or “Plaintiff”) is a large, international military and defense contractor holding several prime contracts with the United States Government. At their Fairdale location Raytheon maintains, stores, and services multiple mobile charging stations and storage locations for lithium-ion battery boxes (“LBBs”). The LBB’s were designed and manufactured by Saft but owned by the…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Witness is Qualified to Opine On Tactics and Uses of Force Employed by the Police
This matter involves an incident that occurred on May 29, 2020, while Plaintiff, David Zuniga was present during the George Floyd protests in Grand Park, Downtown Los Angeles. During this time, Zuniga and his experts contended that he was struck with a nonlethal projectile to his head by Officer Aaron Green. Officer Green, and the…
-
Intellectual Property Expert Witness’ Testimony About Trademark Custom and Usage Admitted
This is a trademark infringement case involving the trademarked phrase “Freedom Pop”. Plaintiff Proccor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Proccor”) contended that Defendant GAT Sports infringed upon its alleged trademark for a “Freedom Pop” flavored Pre-Rx pre-workout supplement. GAT Sports essentially argued that the phrase was used in a non-trademark, descriptive, way to describe the flavor of its…
-
Pulmonary Disease Expert Witness’ Opinions on the Reliability of the DOH Investigations are Barred
Plaintiff Lori LaRock filed a medical malpractice and negligence against Albany County Nursing Home (“ACNH”), the County of Albany, Larry Slatky, Debbie Gossman, Rhonda Lyga, and John and Jane Does #1-5 (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintiff asserted that she and her family often found Sanford unfed, unbathed, ungroomed, and covered in his own urine and vomit. On…
-
Insurance Expert Witness’ Testimony Limited Because it Consists of the Interpretation of Policy Language
Plaintiff American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company (“AESLIC” or “Plaintiff”) issued to J.R. a commercial excess liability insurance policy, which included a premium charge to be computed as a percentage of J.R.’s gross receipts during the policy period. Plaintiff assigned an advanced premium to the Policy based on J.R.’s estimate of its gross receipts during the…
