Tag: Legal Conclusions
-
Civil Rights Expert Witness’ Opinions About Defendant’s Conduct Limited
Plaintiff, Erika Pogorzelska filed this action in August 2019. She alleged in her remaining claims that VanderCook, a school she attended, violated Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”) and the Illinois Civil Rights Remedies Restoration Act by its deliberate indifference to her allegations that she was sexually assaulted and battered by…
-
Safety Expert Witness’ Analysis of the Alleged Discrimination deemed Inadmissible
A district judge in California barred a safety expert witness from testifying about lack of intentional discrimination despite being qualified to offer an opinion on the subject matter. Plaintiff Melvin Patterson is deaf. He brought this action under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act against Defendants Six Flags Theme Parks, Inc., Six…
-
Insurance Expert Witness Barred from Testifying as to which Party is at Fault
This case involves an accumulator universal life insurance policy purchased by Dr. Herbert Wiegand in 2000 when he was 82 years old. The insured was his second wife, Jean Wiegand (nee Walters), who was 80 years old at the time. The policy had a face value (death benefit) of $1.4 million and a maturity date…
-
Insurance Expert Witness’ Testimony on Legal Parameters for Bad Faith Excluded
This case arises out of a dispute over three separate, consecutive, nonrenewable Short Term Medical (“STM”) insurance plans underwritten by Defendant American Financial Security Life Insurance Company (“AFSLIC” or “American”). The type of STM insurance (also referred to as “short term limited duration insurance” or “STLDI”) at issue here is relatively new, first being authorized…
-
Testimony of Vocational Rehabilitation Expert Witness Held to Emphasize on Relevant Factors
Defendant Amazon.com Services, Inc. (“Amazon.com”) initially hired Marcellus McMillian as a seasonal fulfillment associate and then promoted him to fulfillment associate in the make on demand department. Defendants employed him for more than a year, starting on January 11, 2017. McMillian’s back was injured in an unrelated car accident on or around August 3, 2017, and he went on…
-
Environmental Expert Witness barred from testifying about the Applicability of Asbestos National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants
This case involved two buildings in downtown Burley, Idaho, located at 1222 and 1226 Overland Avenue which burned in late January 2018 and were subsequently demolished in mid-February 2018. A small portion of the debris from the buildings was hauled away to a local gravel pit which also operated as a landfill. Rising concerns about…
-
Business Administration and Management Expert Witness Testimony found Inadmissible for not Establishing a Method to Calculate Damages
Plaintiff Kristina Cleaver initiated legal proceedings against her former employer, Transnation Title & Escrow, Inc. dba Fidelity National Title Company (“Fidelity”) based on an accusation of gender discrimination, purportedly in violation of both federal and state laws. Fidelity, identified as a title and escrow company specializing in real estate transactions in collaboration with real estate…
-
Court limits the testimony of Metallurgical Engineering Expert Witness for rendering legal conclusions by stating that certain information was not a trade secret
On March 24, 2021, BPS initiated legal action against Inashco, accusing it of having breached a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) (Claim 1), misappropriation of trade secrets (Claim 2), and unjust enrichment (Claim 3). The first claim alleged that Inashco violated the NDA by using BPS’ confidential information. Similarly, Claim 2 asserted that Inashco had used BPS’…
-
Modifications to an expert report are allowed as long as there are no additions or substantive changes whatsoever; Court limits the testimony of both parties’ experts regarding the customs brokerage industry
This case involves a dispute between JAS Supply, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Radiant Customs Services, Inc. and Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. (“Defendants”) regarding the importation of alcohol wipes from foreign manufacturers. In 2020, Plaintiff contracted with Defendants to assist with importing alcohol wipes into the United States for the first time. Defendant Radiant Global Logistics provided…
-
Court held that the original intent of the expert report does not serve as sufficient grounds for its exclusion but nevertheless rejected some of food safety expert’s conclusions which were not based on his expertise
In a legal dispute concerning recalled pet treats, the Court significantly limited the admission of expert opinions that merely restated established facts or summarized existing evidence. The Court’s decision emphasized that experts should not serve as individuals who determine facts or evaluate evidence on behalf of the jury. Only one expert opinion was permitted, specifically…
