Tag: methodology
-
Economic Damages Expert Witness held to Employ Valid Methodology for Computing Lost Licensing Profits
Plaintiff Brand Design Company, Inc., d/b/a House Industries (“House”), a design studio and typeface foundry is in the business of developing and marketing proprietary fonts. House accused Defendant Rite Aid Corporation of appropriating one of these proprietary fonts and its corresponding font software—Neutraface—in the pharmacy chain’s rebranding effort, with the assistance of Defendants GA Communications, Inc., d/b/a PureRED Creative,…
-
Survey Methodology Employed by Marketing Expert Witness Deemed Admissible
Plaintiff, Anthony Bush on behalf of a class of California consumers, brought a class action against the Defendant, Rust-Oleum Corporation for mislabeling of its “Krud Kutter” cleaning products as “non-toxic” and “Earth friendly,” contending that it violated California consumer-protection laws since the products were, in fact, harmful to humans, animals, and the environment. The operative…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Two-Party Market Analysis Admitted
Hayward Industries, Inc. (the Plaintiff), a company in the pool industry, filed a complaint against competitors (the Defendants) over the sale of aftermarket replacement salt cells for use in Plaintiff’s chlorine generator systems. Chlorine generators, also known as “salt cell systems,” convert dissolved salt into chlorine to sanitize pools. Chlorine generator systems replace the need…
-
Expert found qualified to opine on the Overall Completeness of the Stage Prop based on his experience in Construction Management and Operations
The case originated from a contract disagreement between Movie Prop Rentals LLC and Miami Prop Rentals LLC, businesses in the movie production sector, and The Kingdom of God Global Church, a not-for-profit religious organization. The Plaintiffs claimed that the Defendants did not fulfill their part of a contract concerning the design and construction of a…
-
Court admits the opinions of opposing experts about standard of care exercised to treat burn injuries in flight
This is a claim for damages under Article 17 and Article 21 of the Montreal Convention concerning an incident that occurred on February 11, 2022, during a JetBlue international flight from Orlando, Florida, to Montego Bay, Jamaica. The Plaintiff Julian Buonomo (“Buonomo”) sustained serious injuries when hot water spilled on his right arm and flank.…
-
Court admits the Engineering Methodology employed by the Civil Engineering Expert Witness affirming its consistency with Concrete Construction Industry Practice
Archer Western – de Moya Joint Venture (the “JV”) filed a claim against Ace American Insurance Company (“ACE”), their insurer under a completed value builder’s risk policy, concerning the I-395/S.R. 836 Reconstruction/Rehabilitation Project in Miami, Florida. The claim pertained to bridge components constructed using low strength concrete that failed to meet project specifications. The JV…
-
Court affirms the testimony of Accident Reconstruction Expert despite marginally discussing human factors
This case involves a vehicle accident that occurred on August 24, 2018 in Thomasville, Georgia. Plaintiff Grady Bryan was performing maintenance on a traffic light while positioned in a suspended lift bucket attached to a Georgia Department of Transportation (DOT) utility boom truck. Defendant David Swisher, a tractor trailer driver working for Defendant Greenwood Motor…
-
Court admits Expert Testimony on the Value of NIL Rights in Broadcasts in this Antitrust Lawsuit
Consolidating separate cases involving student-athletes Sedona Prince, Grant House, and Tymir Oliver, the litigation contested National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”) regulations limiting student-athletes’ NIL (name, image, likeness) compensation. Plaintiffs alleged antitrust violations, asserting that these rules restrained fair compensation and artificially suppressed NIL prices. In June 2021, the Court dismissed some of Oliver’s claims seeking injunctive…
-
Court rejects the Firearms Expert Witness’ conclusions with regard to the possibility of the revolver firing without a trigger pull in product liability case
Freedom Arms manufactured the Model 83 Revolver, a single-action handgun firing a .454 Casull cartridge, designed for defense against large animals. This revolver incorporated a manual safety feature to prevent accidental discharge. The accompanying manual, available online or through various channels, contained numerous warnings against mishandling and provided explicit instructions on using the safety features.…
-
Court admits the testimony of Industrial Hygiene & Mold Expert Witness with regard to source of water intrusions that caused the mold growth
Zahid Hotel Group, LLC, the owner of a LaQuinta Inn insured by AmGUARD Insurance Company, claimed extensive damage to the property following Hurricane Ida in August 2021. Although AmGUARD disbursed $1,032,617.92 for building repairs and mitigation, Zahid contended that the sum fell short of covering repair expenses and failed to compensate for business personal property…
