Tag: qualifications
-
Cellular Analysis Expert’s Testimony Involving the Use of CDR and TAR Admitted
The Defendant, Jerry Ray Brown, was charged with one count of attempted bank robbery. Brown ostensibly attempted to take by force, violence, and intimidation from the person and in the presence of bank employees, money belonging to and in the care, custody, control, management, and possession of the FNB Community Bank in Choctaw, Oklahoma. Defendant…
-
Expert Testimony Survives Daubert Challenge in Surgical Mesh Injury Case
Connie Thacker (Plaintiff) received two surgical mesh devices, Prolift and TVT-Secur, as implants on May 8, 2009. Both devices were manufactured by Ethicon, Inc. and were designed to treat pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence in women. Later, Thacker sued, alleging damages resulting from the use of these devices and identified Elizabeth Laposata as her “Case-Specific…
-
Court Limits Testimony of Non-Retained Expert in BNSF Workplace Injury Case
In November 2022, while working as a BNSF intermodal equipment operator, Taylor A. Campbell fell several feet from a railcar ledge while attempting to lock a stuck inter-box connector (IBC). No one witnessed the incident. Campbell blamed the fall on BNSF’s failure to ensure a safe working environment. Fred Reinke, a BNSF manager, had developed…
-
Social Work Expert’s Testimony on PTSD Symptoms in Adult Women Admitted
The claims against La-Norma Ramirez and Washington County stem from Plaintiff Danyale Blackmore’s booking and release at the Washington County Jail. Blackmore alleged that her constitutional rights were violated when she was allegedly strip-searched at the Jail. Plaintiff designated Annette Curtis as a retained rebuttal expert. Curtis will provide testimony regarding the symptoms and diagnosis…
-
Vocational Rehabilitation Expert is Qualified to Serve as an Expert on the ADA and Loss of Earnings
It all started when Plaintiff, Maurice Young (“Young”), was employed by Defendant, Jabil, Inc. (“Jabil”) in the role of Machine Operator I (“Operator”). It should be noted that Young suffers from osteoarthritis in his hips which limits his ability to stand, sit, and walk. Young asked for a new accommodation, applying for the Engineering Technician…
-
Insurance Expert is Not Allowed to Opine on Structural Design
Plaintiffs, Michael and Karen Green claimed that they had sustained loss as a result of hail and wind. Defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company issued them a homeowner’s policy but when Plaintiffs filed a claim for loss under the policy, it gave rise to this dispute because Nationwide apparently failed to reimburse all covered losses under…
-
Neonatology Expert Witness Not Allowed to Opine on Autism
On July 29, 2022, a minor, Kamila, represented by her mother Keila Robles Figueroa (“Plaintiff” or “Robles”), filed a medical malpractice lawsuit against Dr. Juan C. Castañer (“Castañer”), Presbyterian Community Hospital, Inc. (“the Hospital”) and the Hospital Pediátrico Universitario (collectively “Defendants”). The allegations of negligence in this lawsuit are centered on the medical care providers’ treatment…
-
Marketing Expert Witness Allowed to Testify Despite Her Relative Inexperience in the Field of Trademark Law
This case concerns use of the term “XHALE” in connection with identical retail smoke shop services, marketing through the same channels, to the same customer base, and in Hattiesburg, on the same street, resulting in rampant actual confusion. Plaintiff Green Rush, LLC, d/b/a Xhale City claims that its federal trademark registration for “XHALE CITY” not…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Witness is Qualified to Opine On Tactics and Uses of Force Employed by the Police
This matter involves an incident that occurred on May 29, 2020, while Plaintiff, David Zuniga was present during the George Floyd protests in Grand Park, Downtown Los Angeles. During this time, Zuniga and his experts contended that he was struck with a nonlethal projectile to his head by Officer Aaron Green. Officer Green, and the…
-
Psychology Expert Witness’ Testimony Admitted Because of His Involvement in a Research Project Related to TMS
Wave Neuroscience alleged that Brain Frequency infringed four patents in this case. The vast majority of claims asserted in this litigation against Brain Frequency are method claims that relate to the performance of a medical procedure by medical practitioners on patients. Defendants claimed that Brain Frequency is immune because it is a “related health care…
