Tag: Reliable
-
Court Accepts the Mortgage Expert’s Opinion on the OPERS’ Primary Fraud Theory
Defendant Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) offered Dr. Chudozie Okongwu, a mortgage market expert, to discuss the mortgage and subprime markets and the credit crisis between August 1, 2006, and November 20, 2007 (the “Relevant Period”). The lawsuit concerns whether “Freddie Mac concealed its overextension in the nontraditional mortgage market—generally composed of instruments…
-
Engineering Expert’s Testimony on the Formation of Black Ice Admitted
In a premises liability lawsuit, Plaintiff Susana Aqueche claimed she was injured after slipping on ice in the parking lot of a Hobby Lobby and is suing SVAP II Pasadena Crossroads, LLC (SVAP), Sterling Retail, Sterling Mid-Atlantic, The Sterling Organization, Paramount Crossroads, Sterling Organizational Systems, and Hobby Lobby. In response, SVAP, Sterling Retail, Sterling Mid-Atlantic,…
-
Court Admitted Public Relations Expert’s Testimony Describing the Experience of a Wine Consumer
This case examines the compatibility of Ohio’s three-tier liquor control system, established under the Twenty-first Amendment of the United States Constitution, with the Dormant Commerce Clause. The Sixth Circuit has directed the Court to determine, based on the presented facts and evidence, whether the statutes that Plaintiffs’ challenge “(1) ‘can be justified as a public…
-
Accounting Expert Allowed to Testify Despite Lacking Forensic Accounting Expertise
This case involves a dispute over the alleged misuse of funds from two New Mexico payday lending businesses, Cashco, Inc. and Budget Payday Loans, L.P. The Light Defendants (John Ernest Light, Tina S. Light, and Investors Services, Inc.) were hired to manage the financial operations of these businesses, including record-keeping and transaction processing. They were…
-
Human Factors Expert Lacks Expertise in the Context of Officer-Involved Shooting
Essentially, this case involves a civil rights and state tort claim stemming from the fatal shooting of Mickel Lewis, Sr., by Kern County Sheriff Deputy Jason Ayala on October 2, 2020. Therefore, the central legal question is whether Deputy Ayala’s use of deadly force was justified. Consequently, the Plaintiffs have filed a motion to exclude…
-
Neuropsychology Expert’s Opinions Discrediting the Body of False Confession Research Excluded
Essentially, Fulton and Mitchell alleged that they were wrongfully convicted of murder due to fabricated witness testimony and coerced false confessions by Chicago police officers. Consequently, they filed lawsuits claiming constitutional violations. As their trial date approached, the defense sought to introduce Dr. Diana Goldstein because of her extensive background, experience, and specialized knowledge as…
-
Psychiatry Expert’s Testimony Not Fully Excluded Despite His Reliance on a Previous Edition of the DSM
In a recent Michigan case involving allegations of sexual abuse against visually impaired minors in public schools, the admissibility of expert psychiatric testimony became a focal point. Specifically, the Court grappled with challenges to Dr. Gerald Shiener‘s expertise and methodology. Plaintiffs presented Shiener, a psychiatrist, to testify on the “causation and damages” related to the…
-
Ninja’s Silent Danger: Court Admits Expert’s Warning Claim
Allyson Bolden sued SharkNinja after sustaining injuries while using their Intellisense Kitchen System food processor. Bolden claimed a design defect led to the lid jamming, resulting in her injury when trying to remove it. Defendant SharkNinja challenged the admissibility of Plaintiff’s expert, Dr. Wade Lanning‘s, testimony, arguing his qualifications, reliability, and relevance were lacking. Lanning,…
-
Testimony on Medication Effects and Interactions Admitted in Mental Health Malpractice Case
Sabelita Hawkins experienced a psychotic episode in 2011, leading to hospitalization and subsequent treatment at the Puget Sound Veterans Hospital. She alleges that despite informing Dr. Daniel Doan that her prescribed medication was ineffective, no changes were made to her treatment. Later, Dr. Carl Jensen diagnosed her with PTSD but also did not modify her care. A…
-
Evaluating PTSD Imaging Experts: A Rule 702 Court Decision
In a recent legal dispute, the admissibility of expert testimony regarding medical imaging and its correlation to PTSD research was challenged. Specifically, this case highlights the importance of timeliness and the application of Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence in evaluating expert qualifications and the reliability of their opinions. Initially, the Defendant filed…
