Tag: Reliable
-
Legal Ethics Expert Witness’ Opinions Regarding a Conflict of Interest on Coverage Admitted
Plaintiff, Ansur America Insurance Company, sued Defendants, James A. Borland and Quinn, Johnston, Henderson & Pretorious, Chtd., an experienced defense lawyer and his law firm, for alleged legal malpractice in handling a complex product liability case in St. Clair County, Illinois. Plaintiff alleged that Defendants failed to meet the standard of care in representing Plaintiff…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Witness’ Conclusions Regarding Control Excluded
In the early hours of September 24, 2021, Cedric Lofton was arrested for allegedly battering officers of the Wichita Police Department. WPD determined that, due to his arrest, Lofton needed to be taken into custody. Because Lofton was still a juvenile, he was transported to the Sedgwick County Juvenile Intake and Assessment Center (“JIAC”) for…
-
Neurology and Pain Management Expert Witness’ Opinion Regarding Vascular issues Being a Potential Causal Factor Admitted
This maritime negligence case arose from an accident involving Joseph Sylvester that occurred on September 23, 2021. In 2021, Talos operated the South Marsh Island 130 (“SMI 130”) field, located in the Gulf of Mexico on the Outer Continental Shelf. Sylvester, employed as a crane mechanic by Gulf Crane Services, Inc. (“GCS”), was assigned to…
-
Neuropsychology Expert Witness Fails to Provide Any Basis for His Opinion On the Costs of Healthcare
In May 2023, Joy and Brian Parnes filed this lawsuit against the Orange County School Board for disability discrimination and retaliation related to the education of their minor daughter, S.P. Pursuant to Rule 702, the Parneses seek to introduce the opinion testimony of Timothy Conway, Ph.D. in support of their theory that S.P. requires accommodations…
-
Data Analytics Expert Witness’ Testimony Admitted despite his use of a More Conservative Methodology
This matter is a False Claims Act case wherein the Relators alleged that Defendant pharmacies submitted false or fraudulent claims to obtain federal funds from Government Healthcare Programs to which Defendants were not entitled. The Relators alleged this occurred through the electronic submission of inflated usual and customary charges to Government Healthcare Programs because Defendants…
-
Forensic Psychiatry Expert Witness’ Report on Plaintiff’s Mental Health Admitted
On a foggy night in November 2015, Plaintiff Kedron Gaston, a minor at the time, was heavily injured in a car accident. The car, driven by her aunt, collided with the back of a semi-truck, resulting in her aunt’s death. The Plaintiff’s mother, seated in the front passenger position, suffered severe injuries that made her…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Witness’ Testimony About Presence of Probable Cause Excluded
This case arose when Defendant Jacob Salamon, a police officer for the City of Loveland, Ohio, arrested Plaintiff Amanda Caton, an off-duty police officer for the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, for operating a vehicle when intoxicated (“OVI”). Plaintiff Patrick Caton, Amanda Caton’s husband and also an off-duty police officer for the City of Cincinnati, was…
-
Nursing Expert Witness’ Testimony About the Preventability of Suicides Admitted
In February 2019, Jose Banda Pichardo (“Pichardo”) died by suicide while in custody at the Imperial County Sheriff’s Department Regional Adult Detention Facility (“ICRADF”). California Forensic Medical Group is a medical provider that contracted with Imperial County to provide medical and mental health care to inmates at ICRADF. Pichardo’s parents, Jose Trejo and Susana Banda,…
-
Economics Expert Witness’ Opinions of the Purported Economic Loss of Each Plaintiff Admitted
This case arises out of Plaintiffs’ employment with McKesson and their allegation that McKesson discriminated and retaliated against them by denying them religious accommodations to McKesson’s COVID-19 Vaccination Protocol and terminating their employment. Plaintiffs sought damages which, including lost wages, in the form of back pay and front pay, and fringe benefits. Plaintiffs retained Larry…
-
Economics Expert Witness’ Testimony Admitted Because He Has Researched CON Laws
Charles Slaughter is a licensed physical therapist who owns a physical therapy clinic in Jackson, Mississippi. He brought this constitutional challenge to Mississippi’s Certificate of Need (CON) program because Mississippi has had a moratorium on issuing CONs to new home health care businesses for the past 42 years. This case was initiated in the wake…
