Tag: Trade Secret
-
Immunology Expert Witness’ Redevelopment Opinion Excluded
Plaintiff I-Mab Biopharma (“I-Mab” or “Plaintiff”) brought trade secret misappropriation claims against Defendants Inhibrx, Inc. (“Inhibrx”) and Brendan Eckelman (“Dr. Eckelman” and collectively with Inhibrx, “Defendants”). Plaintiff asserted that Defendants misappropriated nine trade secrets (that correspond to molecules designed to treat cancer) that are referred to herein as Trade Secret 1, Trade Secret 2, Trade…
-
Economics Expert Witness’ Testimony Limited Because His Zero Damages Opinion is Irrelevant
Plaintiff I-Mab Biopharma (“I-Mab” or “Plaintiff”) brought trade secret misappropriation claims against Defendants Inhibrx, Inc. (“Inhibrx”) and Brendan Eckelman (“Dr. Eckelman” and collectively with Inhibrx, “Defendants”). Plaintiff asserted that Defendants misappropriated nine trade secrets (that correspond to molecules designed to treat cancer) that are referred to herein as Trade Secret 1, Trade Secret 2, Trade…
-
Fraud Examination Expert Witness’ Testimony About the Effect of Misappropriated Trade Secrets Excluded
This case stems from a trade secret dispute between University of Mississippi Medical Center (“UMMC”) and Defendant Dr. Spencer Sullivan, a former employee of UMMC. The Court has resolved the issue of liability through its Order granting default judgment in favor of Plaintiff. The injury pleaded by UMMC is the loss of certain specific former…
-
Trade Secrets Expert Witness’ Testimony Based on his own Experience Admitted
A district judge in Texas admitted the testimony of a trade secrets expert witness, taking into consideration his extensive and specialized experience. Plaintiff BHI, a leader in the energy industry providing project management and staffing support to the nuclear, fossil, wind, hydro, and government energy markets accused the Defendants KVP Energy Services, Dustin Coble, Welborn…
-
Court refuses to exclude expert opinion on damages for tools, equipment and inventory amidst claims of trade secret misappropriation
This case involved a dispute between Tankmax, Inc. (Tankmax) and its former employee, Wayne Duran, as well as Duran’s new company, American Gas Services LLC (AGS). Tankmax sued Duran and AGS for violations of trade secret laws, computer fraud, tortious interference, unjust enrichment, breach of fiduciary duties and conversion.Wayne Duran was employed by Tankmax and…
-
“Unexplained” Methodology employed by Accounting Expert Witness passes Daubert Test after Court notes that merits and drawbacks of the Methodology have been discussed
Plaintiffs BRP Colleague Inc. (“BRP Colleague”) and Baldwin Krystyn Sherman Partners, LLC (“BKS”) jointly referred to as “BRP,” had initiated legal proceedings against Defendants Edward (Teddy) Gillen (“Gillen”) and Edgewood Partners Insurance Center Inc. (“EPIC”) concerning Gillen’s prior association with BRP and his subsequent employment with EPIC, a direct competitor of BRP. BRP (together with…
-
Experts cannot base their methods on personal experience unless it is proved to be a sufficient basis; Court excludes expert testimony on the cost of developing alleged trade secrets
This case was between Larada Sciences (the Plaintiff) and Pediatric Hair Solutions (PHS – the Defendant) in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. Larada manufactures devices that use heated air to treat head lice and licenses the devices to head lice treatment clinics. In 2015, Larada and PHS entered into license…
