Author: Expert Witness Profiler
-
Evaluating PTSD Imaging Experts: A Rule 702 Court Decision
In a recent legal dispute, the admissibility of expert testimony regarding medical imaging and its correlation to PTSD research was challenged. Specifically, this case highlights the importance of timeliness and the application of Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence in evaluating expert qualifications and the reliability of their opinions. Initially, the Defendant filed…
-
Admitting Foreign Law Experts: Navigating Rule 44.1 in Court
The case centered on a dispute over property ownership in Cuba. The Plaintiff relied on the testimony of Avelino Gonzalez, an expert in Cuban law, to establish their claim. The Defendants, however, challenged the admissibility of Gonzalez’s testimony on multiple grounds. Law And Legal Expert Witness Avelino Gonzalez is an attorney with a Summa Cum…
-
Neuropsychology Expert Witness is Qualified to Offer Opinions on Causation
On October 24, 2019, William Harrison Sims (Plaintiff) was driving his 2004 BMW 330Ci (the “Vehicle”) in Florida when another vehicle unexpectedly turned left in front of him, causing a minor accident. As a result of the collision, the Vehicle’s front driver-side airbag was signaled to deploy. However, the airbag inflator unexpectedly ruptured and shot…
-
Obstetrics and Gynecology Expert Witness’ Opinions on the Filshie Clip Instructions for Use Admitted
Defendants CooperSurgical, Inc., Femcare, Ltd., and Utah Medical Products, Inc. manufacture and distribute birth control devices called Filshie Clips. Filshie Clips are 3-5 millimeters wide and are laparoscopically placed on the fallopian tubes. Plaintiffs are individuals who had tubal ligation surgery in 2009 and 2010. Plaintiffs Giovanna Bulox and Lorena Ahiri Merlo are sisters. Bulox…
-
Accounting Expert Witness’ Opinions About the Unpaid Consulting Fees Excluded
In early 2015, Plaintiffs, US Thrillrides, LLC (“USTR”) and Polercoaster, LLC began discussions with Defendant, Intamin Amusement Rides Int. Corp. Est. about partnering to build Polercoasters for Plaintiffs’ customers. The “Polercoaster” is “a roller coaster that is supported or suspended from a vertical tower instead of moving along a horizontal track.” This case arises from a…
-
Obstetrics and Gynecology Expert Witness Allowed to Testify that Factors Other than Migrated Filshie Clips Caused Plaintiffs’ Injuries
Defendants CooperSurgical, Inc., Femcare, Ltd., and Utah Medical Products, Inc. manufacture and distribute birth control devices called Filshie Clips. Filshie Clips are 3-5 millimeters wide and are laparoscopically placed on the fallopian tubes. Plaintiffs are individuals who had tubal ligation surgery in 2009 and 2010. Plaintiffs Giovanna Bulox and Lorena Ahiri Merlo are sisters. Bulox…
-
Legal Malpractice Expert Witness Failed to Identify a Measurable Standard of Care
Plaintiff Ansur America Insurance Company (“Ansur”) filed this lawsuit alleging legal malpractice related to a product liability case filed in St. Clair County, Illinois after Defendants, James A. Borland and Quinn, Johnston, Henderson & Pretorous CHTD failed to properly manage the defense of the underlying case, resulting in Ansur being forced to settle for an…
-
Software Development Expert Witness Allowed to Testify Despite Using a Records Key
This case arises from the international kidnapping of then-seven-year-old Isabella Miller Jenkins in September 2009 by her mother Lisa Miller to keep her away from her other mother, Janet Jenkins. Isabella remains missing to this day. Plaintiff Janet Jenkins, for herself and as next friend of her daughter Isabella Miller-Jenkins, has brought suit against several…
-
Orthopedic Surgery Expert Witness is Qualified to Diagnose Cervicogenic Headaches
This is a dispute regarding uninsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage. Perez was a passenger in a car accident on April 18, 2018, and sought coverage for past and future medical expenses arising from this accident under an Allstate insurance policy. Perez intended to rely on the expert opinion of Dr. David Badger at trial. The March…
-
Mechanical Engineering Expert Witness is not Qualified to Opine as to the Copyright Infringement Analysis Itself
In early 2015, Plaintiffs, US Thrillrides, LLC (“USTR”) and Polercoaster, LLC began discussions with Defendant, Intamin Amusement Rides Int. Corp. Est. about partnering to build Polercoasters for Plaintiffs’ customers. The Polercoaster is a unique attraction that provides a complete roller coaster experience on a very small footprint, unlike traditional roller coasters which require several acres of…
