Author: Expert Witness Profiler
-
Law And Legal Expert Not Allowed to Opine on the Remodeling Project
This matter arises from damage to Plaintiffs Jacob and Suzanne Kuehn’s home caused by a water loss in December 2023. The Kuehns sued Safeco Insurance Company of America (“Safeco”) alleging breach of contract, violation of the Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”), bad faith, and violation of the Insurance Fair Conduct Act (“IFCA”). In advance of trial,…
-
Mechanical Engineering Expert Not Allowed to Opine on Float Valve Clogging
Grace Pennington filed a complaint alleging that she was seriously injured by an Instant Pot ULTRA Pressure Cooker she had purchased from Kohl’s Corporation. The Defendant filed a motion to exclude the opinions of the Plaintiff’s expert, Dr. David M. Rondinone. Mechanical Engineering Expert Witness David Michael Rondinone holds an M.S. degree and a Ph.D.…
-
Geology Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Subsurface Conditions
This case arises out of Plaintiffs’ claim that structural damage to their home at 496 Southwood Drive in Madisonville, Kentucky, was caused by coal mine subsidence. Val Smith and Gwen Smith obtained a homeowners’ policy from American Strategic Insurance Corp. (“ASIC”) and claimed that mine subsidence caused structural movement and cracking. ASIC denied the claim…
-
Psychiatry Expert Allowed to Opine on Psychological Injuries
Plaintiff Brigid “Bridie” Farrell alleged that Defendant Gabel groomed and sexually abused her from June 1997 to January 1998. Plaintiff filed a motion to exclude the expert testimony of Defendants’ expert, Dr. Charles Saldanha, pursuant to Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Psychiatry Expert Witness Charles Edwin Saldanha graduated from Emory University with…
-
Accounting Expert Was Partly Allowed to Opine on the Business Relationship
This case involves a contract dispute between the Douglas and Amy Mottram and Robert Radke. Prior to 2018, the Mottrams entered into four joint ventures with Radke, in which Radke would buy land in California, on which the Mottrams would construct homes to be resold for mutual profit. Beginning in 2018, the Mottrams and Radke…
-
Statistics Expert Allowed to Opine on Over-Detention
Plaintiffs Alanna Dunn, Reginald Haymon, Adam Day, Eric Zeider, Cameron Leonard, and Jason Wilson filed this class action alleging that the deliberate indifference of Cuyahoga County and the Cuyahoga County Sheriff’s Department caused them to be over-detained in the Cuyahoga County Jail after the legal basis for their detention ceased to exist. Plaintiffs retained Lacey…
-
Entertainment Industry Expert Not Allowed to Opine on a Party’s Mental State
In this breach-of-contract suit stemming from an exclusive license to present a live touring show of the popular children’s show, CoComelon, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant CCM Touring LLC and Counterclaim Defendant S2BN Entertainment Corporation (“S2BN”) (collectively, the “CCM Parties”) sought to exclude the opinions and testimony of Eric Grilly and George Wade, experts for Defendant/Counterclaimant Moonbug Entertainment…
-
Aviation Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Wing Repairs
The claims in this action for negligence, gross negligence, and vicarious liability arise out of damage caused to The Jones Company’s (“TJC”) 2024 Embraer Phenom 300E aircraft (“the aircraft”). On December 30, 2024, the aircraft was flown to New Orleans Lakefront Airport, where Signature Flight Support, LLC was providing fixed-base operator services, including ground handling…
-
Pharmacology Expert Allowed to Opine on the Clinical Trial
Alzamend Neuro, Inc is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing treatments for Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. To advance the development of a new treatment called ALZN002, Alzamend sought to conduct a phase I/IIA clinical trial to evaluate its safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy. Biorasi, LLC is a contract research organization or clinical…
-
Parking Expert Not Allowed to Opine on Duty to Warn
Plaintiffs Lisa Brun and Daniel Brun ( collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this action against Defendants PeakCM Lake Street Hotel, LLP, d/b/a/ Hampton Inn (“Hampton Inn”), the City of St. Albans (“St. Albans”), Integrated Technical Systems, Inc. (“ITS”), Cross Consulting Engineers, P.C. (“Cross”), and Conner Communications, Inc. (“Conner”) ( collectively, “Defendants”) arising out of the injuries Ms.…
