Category: Expert Challenges
-
Economics Expert Was Allowed to Opine on the Cut-Off Date for Damages
This is an employment lawsuit brought by Stephen (Rex) Sanders and Terri Levels, who both worked at the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Sanders served as the Chief Administrative Officer, and Levels served as the Human Resources Officer. In 2023, the District terminated the employment of both Sanders and Levels. Sanders and Levels claimed…
-
Engineering Expert was Allowed to Opine on Hurricane Damage
On August 27, 2020, Hurricane Laura made landfall in Southwest Louisiana. In the original complaint, The Pentecostal Church of DeQuincy (“TPCD”) alleged that it sustained damage from the Hurricane, and that Church Mutual has underestimated the cost of repairs. The five (5) buildings considered as “Covered Property” at issue in this litigation are identified as…
-
Internal Medicine Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Medical Effects
Plaintiff, Robert Rone (“Rone”) asserted claims against Kiesha Pettway, RN, and Felicia Crawford, CRNP, for alleged violations of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution pursuant to 42 USC § 1983 relating to Rone’s incarceration at the Mobile County Metro Jail on May 7, 2021. Crawford and Pettway filed a motion to exclude the…
-
Hospitality Expert’s Testimony on Lost Investments Excluded
In this landlord-tenant dispute, Defendant Gator Flower Mound, LLC (“Gator”) asked the Court to exclude the damages testimony of Alan Someck, the expert witness designated by Plaintiff Arch & Eng, LLC (“Z Grill” or “Plaintiff”), as irrelevant and unreliable. Z Grill alleged economic injury due to problems with the premises it leased from Gator, the…
-
Fire Investigation Expert Witness Was Allowed to Opine on the Defective Candle
Plaintiffs Robert and Jill Motto brought this action to recover for property damage to their home arising from a fire allegedly caused by a defective candle manufactured and sold by Defendants Newell Brands and The Yankee Candle Company. During the litigation, Plaintiffs retained two experts, Roger Spadt and Dr. John Golder, to investigate the origin…
-
Insurance Expert’s Legal Opinions Excluded
On August 27, 2020, Hurricane Laura made landfall in Southwest Louisiana. In the original complaint, The Pentecostal Church of DeQuincy (“TPCD”) alleged that it sustained damage from the hurricane and that Church Mutual underestimated the cost of repairs. The five (5) buildings considered “Covered Property” at issue in this litigation are identified as: (1) the…
-
Law And Legal Expert Allowed to Opine on Firm Management
This case features a collapsed Ponzi scheme, more than 200 investor-victims, and a federal equity Receiver. The Receiver sued Baker Donelson law firm and two of its former employees— individuals now with federal criminal convictions—for aiding and abetting, civil conspiracy, and other claims under Mississippi law. She seeks to hold them accountable for “the unsustainable…
-
Accounting Expert Was Not Fully Allowed to Opine on Calculated Future Lost Profits
Plaintiff Barrett Business Services, Inc. (“BBSI”) is a human resources management company that contracts with small and medium-sized businesses to provide human resource management solutions, including temporary staffing and professional services. It provided these services to employers throughout the Yakima area and particularly to fruit growers and other agricultural companies. On April 23, 2014, BBSI…
-
Psychology Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Voluntary Adult Sex-Work Subculture
Defendants Brandon Washington and Maria Georgianna Palm are charged with various crimes arising out of their scheme to recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, obtain, and maintain vulnerable women, and to perform commercial sex acts for their financial benefit via threats of force, fraud, and coercion. The United States of America filed a motion in limine…
-
Law And Legal Expert Was Not Allowed to Opine on Notaries
This case features a collapsed Ponzi scheme, more than 200 investor-victims, and a federal equity Receiver. The Receiver sued Baker Donelson law firm and two of its former employees— individuals now with federal criminal convictions—for aiding and abetting, civil conspiracy, and other claims under Mississippi law. She seeks to hold them accountable for “the unsustainable…
