Tag: Expert Testimony
-
Emergency Medicine Expert Allowed to Testify Because of His Familiarity with Springfield’s Medical Community
Plaintiff, Ashley Huddleston was born with a genetic condition called muscular dystrophy, which required her to be in a wheelchair and utilize a tracheostomy since age 11. On December, 2021, at around 2:36 p.m., Plaintiff presented to the Tristar Northcrest Medical Center ED with low oxygen, shortness of breath, and a history of muscular dystrophy…
-
General Surgery Expert Was Barred From Using the Precise Legal Phrase “Deliberately Indifferent”
Dezmen McBride was booked into custody at the W.C. “Dub” Brassell Detention Center on May 21, 2021. McBride died 15 days later on June 5, 2021, at the age of 18 years old. Deborah McBride commenced this action alleging that County Defendants and Separate Defendant Lieutenant Samuel Baker, Jr., in his individual capacity: were deliberately…
-
Technology Expert Allowed to Testify Despite Not Using the Software Systems at Issue
Plaintiffs Donna Wood, Caelan Doherty, Max Goldstein, Bridget Logan, James Kyle Newman, Lakisha Watson-Moore, Tristan Angulo, Alexandra Marie Wheatley-Diaz, Robin Ceppos, and Nick Coker (together, “Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, bring this collective and class action against Mike Bloomberg 2020, Inc. (the “Campaign” or the “Defendant”), asserting claims under the Fair…
-
Intellectual Property Expert’s Opinions may Assist the Jury’s Statutory Damages Determination
Plaintiffs manufacture, market, and sell premium, luxury, and sports eyewear products, including Ray-Ban, Oakley, and Costa. Plaintiffs own several trademarks for these various brands in the United States. Defendants own and operate the Beach Blvd. Flea Market (the “Flea Market”), in Jacksonville. This is a contributory trademark infringement case involving the repeated display and sale…
-
Data Privacy Expert Has Sufficient Experience in TCPA Compliance and Wrong Number Issues
David Elliot filed a lawsuit against Humana, claiming the company violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by repeatedly calling him with robocalls even though he wasn’t a customer and had informed them they had the wrong number. Elliot wants to pursue this as a class action, arguing that many others have experienced similar unwanted…
-
Forensic Engineering Expert’s Testimony Admitted Despite his Reliance on an Article Written in 2014
This case arises from a fire that occurred on Plaintiff’s Insured’s property, for which Plaintiff alleges the following alternative claims against Defendant: (1) strict product liability; (2) negligence (resulting from product defects); (3) breach of implied warranty of merchantability; and (4) breach of implied warranty of fitness. The most probable ignition source of the fire…
-
Emergency Medicine Expert Barred from Offering Legal Conclusions Regarding whether EMTALA was Violated
The present case stems from incidents occurring around 2:00 a.m. on December 18, 2020, when Angela Cleveland arrived at the Emergency Department (ED) entrance of Bienville Medical Center (BMC) with her 29-year-old son, Kedeldric Dontrez Brown. The Plaintiff has brought claims under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), asserting that Brown’s death resulted…
-
Nursing Expert’s Testimony Would Not Assist the Jury in Determining Whether the Plaintiff has a Disability
Bernice McLaurin has sued her former employer, the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) in Jackson, Mississippi, claiming racial discrimination and discrimination based on an unspecified medical disability. McLaurin, an African-American, was hired as a clinical pharmacist at the G.V. Sonny Montgomery Medical Center in Jackson (VAMC) on May 12, 2019, with a one-year probationary period.…
-
Court Accepts the Mortgage Expert’s Opinion on the OPERS’ Primary Fraud Theory
Defendant Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) offered Dr. Chudozie Okongwu, a mortgage market expert, to discuss the mortgage and subprime markets and the credit crisis between August 1, 2006, and November 20, 2007 (the “Relevant Period”). The lawsuit concerns whether “Freddie Mac concealed its overextension in the nontraditional mortgage market—generally composed of instruments…