Tag: Reliable
-
Construction Expert Allowed to Opine on Repair Estimates
This matter involves an insurance claim for damages associated with hurricane Laura. On or about September 16, 2020, Plaintiff, The Pentecostal Church Of Dequincy (“TPCD”) retained a public adjuster, Chris Tremaine. Tremaine worked with Church Mutual’s field adjuster, Trey Johnson, to schedule a joint inspection of TPCD’s campus on September 30 and October 1, 2020.…
-
Petroleum Engineering Expert’s Testimony on Offshore Rig Operations Admitted
This matter concerns an incident aboard the Valaris 144 while the vessel was performing offshore drilling services in the Gulf of Mexico off the Louisiana coast. Caleb Kittrell worked as a roustabout for Ensco Offshore on board the vessel owned by Rowan Offshore Luxembourg. On December 27, 2023, Kittrell was instructed to disconnect a jet…
-
Accounting Expert Was Allowed to Opine on the Lease Auditing Process
600 Cleveland owned a commercial office building located at 600 Cleveland Street, Clearwater, Florida 33601 from September 9, 2013, to April 1, 2024. Bank of America, N.A. (BANA) and 600 Cleveland assumed a lease agreement originally entered into by other parties on December 1, 1986, and both were bound by the agreement. This lawsuit arises…
-
Ski Safety Expert was Allowed to Opine on the Use of Blue Fencing
This case arises from a skiing accident that occurred at Mountain Creek’s ski resort (“the Resort”). On February 21, 2021, Pierino Perciballi and his sixteen-year-old son Matteo Perciballi chose to ski down the Matchmaker trail, an intermediate difficulty terrain park course contained within the Resort. The Matchmaker trail is adjacent to the Resort’s “learning area.”…
-
Law Enforcement Expert’s Testimony on the Use of Pepper Spray Limited
Plaintiff LaBlanca Sibley’s excessive force claim against Officer Nicholas S. Riggall, arising from her arrest and detention, was based on Riggall’s use of pepper spray while she was seated in the patrol car. Sibley retained Mr. Jeronimo Rodriguez, an expert in law enforcement practices and use-of-force standards. Riggall moved to exclude Rodriguez’s opinions and testimony.…
-
Mechanical Engineering Expert’s Testimony about the Defective Lawnmower Excluded
Plaintiffs Jaron and Rachel George (“Plaintiffs”) brought this subrogation action against Defendants Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (“SBD”) and MTD Products, Inc. (“MTD”) for strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty claims based on a riding lawnmower fire resulting in substantial damage to Plaintiffs’ home. Defendants filed a motion in limine to exclude one of…
-
Accounting Expert’s Lost-Opportunity Testimony Admitted
Plaintiffs Joshua Cane Jellison and Jessica Marie Jellison (collectively “Plaintiffs”) alleged violations of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, against PHH Mortgage Corporation, the assignee and servicer of their mortgage loan. Plaintiffs claimed that they entered into a COVID-19 forbearance, which caused them to accrue past due payments. According to Plaintiffs, PHH…
-
Public Contracts Expert’s Testimony on Property Management Excluded
This action arises from allegations that Fluor Corporation, Inc., and Fluor Intercontinental, Inc. (collectively, “Fluor”), submitted false or misleading information to the United States Government in connection with performance and award-fee determinations under the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program IV (“LOGCAP IV”). Specifically, LOGCAP IV was a multiple-award, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract administered by the United States Army…
-
Employment Expert’s Testimony on the Work Environment Excluded
This case arises from an employment dispute involving Defendant Gannett Co., Inc., doing business as USA Today. Plaintiff Taylor Bailey, a former Gannett employee, asserted claims against Gannett for breach of contract and sex discrimination under Title VII. Bailey retained Chris S. Thrutchley provide expert opinions and testify regarding Plaintiff’s allegations and Defendant’s alleged conduct…
-
Finance Expert’s Testimony on Corporate Ethics Excluded
This case arises from Fluor’s performance under LOGCAP IV, Task Order 0005 (“TO5”), under which Fluor provided logistics and support services to U.S. military operations in Afghanistan. As a cost-reimbursable contract, TO5 was subject to oversight by multiple Government entities, including the Defense Contract Management Agency (“DCMA”) and the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”). As…
