Tag: Rule 26
-
Court Strikes Structural Engineering Expert Witness’ Testimony on Hurricane Damage Citing Month-Long Disclosure Delay
Philip and Nancy Fairman’s home sustained severe flooding during Hurricane Ian. After the storm, they filed a damage claim with their insurer, Defendant American Strategic Insurance Corp (“ASI”), to seek compensation for the losses. ASI acknowledged coverage but disputed the extent of the damage. When the Fairmans and ASI could not reach a settlement, the…
-
Defendant Was Not Justified in Failing to Disclose Orthopedic Sports Medicine Expert Witness’ Report Regarding the Plaintiff’s Medical Condition
Plaintiff Deana Hosie alleges that, on November 17, 2017, while dining at the Defendant Omni Hotels Management Corporation’s hotel restaurant, she tripped and fell over a box-shaped object on the floor, causing her serious injuries. After disclosing expert Charles DePaolo, M.D., the Defendant indicated that DePaolo would not provide a report until “after his forthcoming independent…
-
Radiology Expert Witness Barred From Testifying for Failing to Provide the Court With a Report
Plaintiff, Wendy Marie Henshaw alleged that she slipped and fell on a liquid substance on Defendant Wal-Mart’s premises on October 28, 2021. Henshaw filed a motion to strike Defendant’s expert witness Dr. Marc Fredric Glickstein. Henshaw noted that Defendant timely served its expert witness disclosure and listed Glickstein as an expert in diagnostic radiology; however,…
-
Experts are entitled to a reasonable fee despite objections to the admissibility of their opinions
In February 2016, Plaintiffs-Appellants Scott Miller and Michael Spaulding, two Seattle Police officers, fatally shot Che Andre Taylor, a Black man, as they tried to arrest him. Four days after the shooting, Defendant-Appellee Kshama Sawant, then a member of the Seattle City Council, told a crowd of protestors in front of the Seattle Police Department…
-
Economics Expert Witness’ Report ran afoul of Rule 26 Requirements
Plaintiff, a long-time employee of Chevron, filed his First Amended Complaint on August 22, 2023 and alleged that Chevron’s Pascagoula Refinery had been marred by racism and sexism, that his contributions to the company exceeded his compensation, and that “discriminatory practices have prevented him from being promoted.” The issue before the Court is whether the…
-
Construction Expert Witness’ Deposition Testimony deemed “Incomplete and Inconclusive”
This action stems from a trip and fall incident that occurred on July 19, 2019, while Plaintiff, Carolyn Simmons was walking and tripped along a dangerous and defective sidewalk located in front of Rite Aid in Ridgeland, South Carolina. The Defendant, Rite Aid of South Carolina, Inc., Walgreens, and Sitaras and Tzioros Properties, Inc., (hereafter…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Witness’ Supplemental Report on Deviation from Police Practices Admitted
Plaintiff Kevin Strickland filed this lawsuit against the Kansas City, Missouri, Board of Police Commissioners and five Kansas City police officers for alleged unconstitutional conduct that resulted in his wrongful conviction. On June 21, 2024, Plaintiff issued its police practices expert, Russell Fischer’s supplemental report. The supplemental report is 2.5 pages long, and the revisions are…
-
Accident Reconstruction Expert Witness’ Testimony Admitted despite his Alleged Disregard of the Evidence
This Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) case arises out of an accident that occurred on January 5, 2021 between Plaintiff Avery Stinson and a U.S. Postal Service tractor-trailer driven by Stewart Henry. When the accident occurred, Plaintiff was operating a bicycle on a sidewalk and attempting to cross an intersection. At the same time, a…
-
Testimony of Life Care Planning Expert Witness Admitted Despite Claims of Rule 26 Deficiencies
The first-party lawsuit originated from a collision involving multiple vehicles on May 2, 2017. Plaintiffs Steve Watkins (“Mr. Watkins”) and Lisa Watkins (“Ms. Watkins”) were traveling in a vehicle in Harris County, Texas, when they were struck from behind and pushed into the vehicle in front of them. They were in the process of taking…
-
Psychology Expert Witness’ Depression Diagnosis Upheld
Plaintiff Duane Anthony Beyenhof alleged that his former employer Defendant Schwan’s Consumer Brands, Inc. (“Schwan’s”) wrongfully terminated him in retaliation for reporting illegal activity at work and because of his age. Schwan’s claimed he was terminated for not wearing a seatbelt in violation of Defendant Schwan’s Consumer Brands, Inc.’s (“Schwan’s” or “Defendant”) zero tolerance Seat…
