Category: Expert Challenges
-
Mechanical Engineering Expert Witness is not Qualified to Opine as to the Copyright Infringement Analysis Itself
In early 2015, Plaintiffs, US Thrillrides, LLC (“USTR”) and Polercoaster, LLC began discussions with Defendant, Intamin Amusement Rides Int. Corp. Est. about partnering to build Polercoasters for Plaintiffs’ customers. The Polercoaster is a unique attraction that provides a complete roller coaster experience on a very small footprint, unlike traditional roller coasters which require several acres of…
-
Automotive Engineering Expert Witness’ Testimony Regarding the Latent Defect in Airbag Inflators Admitted
Plaintiff, William Harrison Sims’ claims arise out of an October 24, 2019, two-vehicle collision involving Plaintiff, who was operating the 2004 BMW (“Subject BMW”). Tameca Harris-Jackson (“Harris-Jackson”) was operating the Hyundai that collided with the Subject BMW. Plaintiff alleges he sustained “severe, permanent, and life-altering injuries” due to the driver-side Takata airbag unexpectedly rupturing and…
-
Anthropology Expert Witness’ Testimony on Gift-Giving Customs Excluded
It all started when a grand jury indicted Senator Robert Menendez (“Menendez”), Nadine Menendez, Wael Hana, Fred Daibes, and Jose Uribe for their roles in a complex scheme to bribe Menendez to take official acts to benefit them and foreign governments in September 2023. After a nine-week trial, a jury found Defendants Menendez, Hana, and…
-
Alternative Damages Calculation Included in the Fraud Investigation Expert Witness’ Supplemental Report Excluded
Plaintiff Aaron Edwards filed this lawsuit against his former employer,Defendant First Trust, alleging that he was terminated in retaliation for engaging in purported whistleblowing activities. He asserted claims under the anti-retaliation and whistleblower protection provisions provide under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“SOX”), the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), and the Consumer Financial…
-
Accounting Expert Witness Reliably Concludes That There Is No Common Value Ascribed to Points Universally
Plaintiffs, Angelique L. Lingard and Sudarien D. Smith brought this proposed consumer class action on behalf of themselves and other military servicemembers who are similarly situated against Defendants Holiday Inn Club Vacations, Inc. f/k/a Orange Lake Country Club, Inc. (“HICV”) for alleged violations of the Military Lending Act. Plaintiffs and the proposed class members purchased…
-
Law Enforcement Expert Witness Cannot Opine on the Duties of Railway Police Officers in Idaho
On February 28, 2022, Adam Bennett stole a ride on a BNSF railcar in Kootenai County. BNSF Special Agent Daniel Mattson intercepted him and was informed by police dispatch—erroneously—that he had a warrant for his arrest in Washington but not Idaho. Based on this information, and COVID procedures governing misdemeanor arrests, Agent Mattson released Bennett…
-
Computer Science Expert Witness’ Testimony About the Disclosure of App Users’ Email Addresses Admitted
In this putative class action, Plaintiff Charles Therrien claimed that Defendant Hearst Television, Inc. (HTV or Hearst), unlawfully disclosed his personally identifiable information – including a record of every video he had viewed on Hearst’s Apps – to two third parties, Braze and Google, in violation of the Video Privacy Protection Act. HTV argued that its…
-
Insurance Law Expert Witness’ Testimony Does Not Survive the Rule 37 Challenge
A fire took place overnight at Tiffany Keen and Trevor Wogrin’s newly-purchased residence at 45100 County Road 1 in Parker (the “Home”), on June 5-6, 2022 (the “Fire”), causing damage. The Home was insured by a homeowner’s insurance policy issued by Allstate (the “Policy”). The Insureds submitted a claim to Allstate on June 6, 2022…
-
Transportation Safety Expert Witness’ Testimony About the Road Conditions Admitted
Plaintiff, Luvelle James alleged that during a winter storm on January 6, 2022, his car was struck on Interstate 55 by an Aramark truck being driven by Steven Moore. As a result of this crash, Plaintiff alleged injuries to his back, neck, and head. He sought damages for past and future medical bills, past and future mental and…
-
Transportation Engineering Expert Witness’ Opinion on Routine Commerce Deemed Reliable
This lawsuit arises out of Port Arthur’s decision to designate Sassine Avenue as a “no truck route.” Kirk Thomas (“Thomas”) and KT Trucking and Cattle, LLC (“KT Trucking”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) engaged in various agricultural and commercial activities on Thomas’ property, including a land farming operation and the management of his personal trucking business. As a…
