Category: Expert Challenges
-
OSHA Expert Barred From Testifying About Causation
David Badagliacco, a Skokie, Illinois police officer, sued Safariland, LLC, alleging his exposure to pepper spray during their training course was the reason he suffered from an eye infection necessitating cornea replacement surgery. Badagliacco contended that the negligent, willful and wanton operation of the training course caused his injuries. Plaintiff David Badagliacco retained expert witness…
-
Belated Production of the Accounting Expert’s Report Was Not Justified
Asserting various state and federal claims arising from alleged trademark infringement, Sacks Holdings, Inc. (the “Plaintiff” or “Sacks”) sued Grin Natural USA Limited, Grin Holdings Limited, Grin Natural US Limited, and Grin Natural Products Limited (collectively, the “Defendants” or “Grin”) for, inter alia, trademark infringement. In July 2024, Defendants’ counsel contacted Julianne “Juli” Saitz at…
-
Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation Expert’s Report Did Not Contain Any Analysis of a Standard of Care
This case relates to the incarceration of Plaintiff, Nocomie Tomia Moore, in the Spokane County Jail, as well as medical care and treatment she received from Registered Nurse Tsubasa Bruce, Physician Assistant Denae Paul, and NaphCare, Inc. Moore brought claims for violations of Washington State’s Medical Malpractice statute. Defendants sought to exclude Plaintiff’s expert witness,…
-
Aviation Expert’s Testimony on Flight Attendant Conduct Excluded
In this personal injury case, Plaintiff Ana Maria Marcela Tavantzis (“Tavantzis”), individually and on behalf of her husband, Jesus Plascencia (“Plasencia”), alleged Defendant American Airlines, Inc. (“American”) was responsible for a stroke Plasencia suffered just prior to landing on an international flight from Miami to Madrid, Spain. Plaintiff’s expert Captain Richard J. Levy advanced three…
-
Firearms Expert’s Testimony Excluded Because of His Limited Experience with Machineguns
Defendant Chase Farmer was charged and convicted of multiple firearms offenses in a trial spanning April 29, 2025, to May 6, 2025. Specifically, Defendant was charged with importing, possessing, transporting, and failing to keep proper records for drop-in auto sears (“DIAS”) and Glock switches from Russia, which are machinegun conversion devices regulated as machineguns under…
-
Mortgage Expert Allowed to Testify Despite Not Updating the Earnings Model
The lawsuit concerns whether “Freddie Mac concealed its overextension in the nontraditional mortgage market—generally composed of instruments known as subprime mortgages or low credit and high risk instruments—and its materially deficient underwriting, risk management and fraud detection practices through misstatements and omissions to investors.” Plaintiff Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (“OPERS”) retained Howard Shapiro as…
-
Intellectual Property Expert’s Opinion on Settlement Licenses Excluded
Plaintiffs’ claim for breach of contract is based on a 2001 licensing agreement (“the 2001 License” or “the License”) between Plaintiffs and Defendant Extreme Networks, Inc. (“Extreme”). Plaintiffs retained Mark Chandler to issue an opinion about “agreements and negotiations related to the licensing, development and commercial use of software, copyrights, and other intellectual property.” According…
-
Leasing Experts Are Not Allowed to Define Industry Standards
This case is a landlord/tenant dispute regarding a lease agreement between Plaintiff/landlord Trustees Main/270 and Defendants/tenants ApplianceSmart, Inc., and JANONE, Inc. The claims arise from Defendant ApplianceSmart’s failure to pay pursuant to a lease agreement, and Defendant JANONE’s obligations as guarantor under the lease. Plaintiff filed a motion in limine related to two witnesses Defendants…
-
Appraisal and Valuation Expert is Qualified to Testify about the Value of the Porsche
Joseph Falasco bought a non-functioning 1974 Porsche 911S for $10,000 and put a significant amount of time and money into restoring it, including the installation of a new engine and transmission. Falasco later filed a claim regarding the non-collision fire that destroyed Plaintiff’s 1974 Porsche 911S (the “1974 Porsche”) and ended up suing USAA for…
-
Legal Ethics Expert Barred From Opining on the Reasonableness of the Plaintiff’s Actions
Plaintiff law firm filed a Complaint on March 2, 2023, asserting a single count of promissory estoppel against Defendant limited liability company for unpaid legal fees and costs (plus interest). Plaintiff said that the unpaid legal expenses were incurred during Plaintiff’s representation of Defendant’s consultant, Luciana Soledade Rock (“Rock”), in a state-court civil fraud action, James Correia…
